From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (lpfc) Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:14:41 -0700 Message-ID: <5187D6F1.9070103@infradead.org> References: <20130506144207.c812a0227d7763d26e5fec80@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130506144207.c812a0227d7763d26e5fec80@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Smart , linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 05/05/13 21:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being > multiple copies of some commits in various trees. Please clean this up > and resist the temptataion to rebase your trees on the way to your > upstream ... > > Changes since 20130506: > on i386: # CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF is not set drivers/built-in.o: In function `lpfc_bg_crc': (.text+0x3cb3c9): undefined reference to `crc_t10dif' -- ~Randy