linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	David Dillow <dillowda-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org>,
	Vu Pham <vuhuong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sebastian Riemer
	<sebastian.riemer-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	James Bottomley
	<jbottomley-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:37:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C7F72C.2050004@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C764FB.6070207-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>

On 06/23/13 23:13, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 08:28 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> +		/*
>> +		 * It can occur that after fast_io_fail_tmo expired and before
>> +		 * dev_loss_tmo expired that the SCSI error handler has
>> +		 * offlined one or more devices. scsi_target_unblock() doesn't
>> +		 * change the state of these devices into running, so do that
>> +		 * explicitly.
>> +		 */
>> +		spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
>> +		__shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost)
>> +			if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_OFFLINE)
>> +				sdev->sdev_state = SDEV_RUNNING;
>> +		spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
> 
> Is it possible for this to race with scsi_eh_offline_sdevs? Can it be
> looping over cmds offlining devices while this is looping over devices
> onlining them?
> 
> It seems this can also happen for all transports/drivers. Maybe a a scsi
> eh/lib helper function that syncrhonizes with the scsi eh completion
> would be better.

I'm not sure it's possible to avoid such a race without introducing
a new mutex. How about something like the (untested) SCSI core patch
below, and invoking scsi_block_eh() and scsi_unblock_eh() around any
reconnect activity not initiated from the SCSI EH thread ?

[PATCH] Add scsi_block_eh() and scsi_unblock_eh()

---
 drivers/scsi/hosts.c      |    1 +
 drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c |   10 ++++++++++
 include/scsi/scsi_host.h  |    1 +
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 17e2ccb..0df3ec8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
 	init_waitqueue_head(&shost->host_wait);
 
 	mutex_init(&shost->scan_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&shost->block_eh_mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * subtract one because we increment first then return, but we need to
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index ab16930..566daaa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ static int scsi_begin_eh(struct Scsi_Host *host)
 {
 	int res;
 
+	res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&host->block_eh_mutex);
+	if (res)
+		goto out;
+
 	spin_lock_irq(host->host_lock);
 	switch (host->shost_state) {
 	case SHOST_DEL:
@@ -565,6 +569,10 @@ static int scsi_begin_eh(struct Scsi_Host *host)
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(host->host_lock);
 
+	if (res)
+		mutex_unlock(&host->block_eh_mutex);
+
+out:
 	return res;
 }
 
@@ -579,6 +587,8 @@ static void scsi_end_eh(struct Scsi_Host *host)
 	if (host->eh_active == 0)
 		wake_up(&host->host_wait);
 	spin_unlock_irq(host->host_lock);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&host->block_eh_mutex);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 9785e51..d7ce065 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
 	spinlock_t		*host_lock;
 
 	struct mutex		scan_mutex;/* serialize scanning activity */
+	struct mutex		block_eh_mutex; /* block ML LLD EH calls */
 
 	struct list_head	eh_cmd_q;
 	struct task_struct    * ehandler;  /* Error recovery thread. */
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-24  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-12 13:17 [PATCH 0/14] IB SRP initiator patches for kernel 3.11 Bart Van Assche
     [not found] ` <51B87501.4070005-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-12 13:26   ` [PATCH 06/14] IB/srp: Keep rport as long as the IB transport layer Bart Van Assche
2013-06-12 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling Bart Van Assche
     [not found]   ` <51B8777B.5050201-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 19:43     ` Vu Pham
2013-06-14 13:19       ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]         ` <51BB1857.7040802-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-14 17:59           ` Vu Pham
     [not found]             ` <51BB5A04.3080901-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-15  9:52               ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]                 ` <51BC3945.9030900-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-17  6:18                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17  7:04                     ` Bart Van Assche
2013-06-17  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17  7:29                         ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]                           ` <51BEBAEA.4080202-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-17  8:10                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-06-17 10:13                             ` Sebastian Riemer
2013-06-18 16:59                 ` Vu Pham
     [not found]                   ` <51C09202.2040503-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-19 13:00                     ` Bart Van Assche
2013-06-23 21:13   ` Mike Christie
     [not found]     ` <51C764FB.6070207-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24  7:37       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-19 13:44 Jack Wang
2013-06-19 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-06-21 12:17   ` Jack Wang
2013-06-24 13:48 Jack Wang
     [not found] ` <51C84E39.80806-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24 15:50   ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]     ` <51C86AB4.1000906-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-24 16:05       ` Jack Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C7F72C.2050004@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche-hinycgiudog@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dillowda-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jbottomley-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sebastian.riemer-EIkl63zCoXaH+58JC4qpiA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vuhuong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).