linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vaughan <vaughan.cao@oracle.com>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
	JBottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:19:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FF0BC0.5020702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51FC9449.4060906@interlog.com>

On 08/03/2013 01:25 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-08-01 01:01 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> On 13-07-22 01:03 PM, Jörn Engel wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 July 2013 12:40:29 +0800, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is a race when open sg with O_EXCL flag. Also a race may
>>>> happen between
>>>> sg_open and sg_remove.
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v4:
>>>>   * [3/4] use ERR_PTR series instead of adding another parameter in
>>>> sg_add_sfp
>>>>   * [4/4] fix conflict for cherry-pick from v3.
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v3:
>>>>   * release o_sem in sg_release(), not in sg_remove_sfp().
>>>>   * not set exclude with sfd_lock held.
>>>>
>>>> Vaughan Cao (4):
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open
>>>>    [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device
>>>>      locking
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/scsi/sg.c | 178
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>>   1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Patchset looks good to me, although I didn't test it on hardware yet.
>>> Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
>>>
>>> James, care to pick this up?
>>
>> Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
>>
>> Tested O_EXCL with multiple processes and threads; passed.
>> sg driver prior to this patch had "leaky" O_EXCL logic
>> according to the same test. Block device passed.
>>
>> James, could you clean this up:
>>    drivers/scsi/sg.c:242:6: warning: unused variable ‘res’
>> [-Wunused-variable]
>
> Further testing suggests this patch on the sg driver is
> broken, so I'll rescind my ack.
>
> The case it is broken for is when a device is opened
> without O_EXCL. Now if, while it is open, a second
> thread/process tries to open the same device O_EXCL
> then IMO the second open should fail with EBUSY.
>
> My testing shows that O_EXCL opens properly deflect
> other O_EXCL opens.
Hi  Doug,

My test don't have this issue. The routine is something as below:

I start three opens without O_EXCL, wait 30s each, and open with
O_EXCL|O_NONBLOCK, it failed with EBUSY.
And I also call myopen with/without O_EXCL many times in background at
the same time, and the test is passed. I don't know why it failed in
your test.

Usage: myopen [-e][-n][-d delay] -f file
      -e: exclude
      -n: nonblock
      -d: delay N seconds and then close.

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[1] 3417
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[2] 3418
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[3] 3419
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
max_active_device=6(origin 1)
 def_reserved_size=32768
 >>> device=sg5 scsi5 chan=0 id=1 lun=0   em=0 sg_tablesize=55 excl=0
   FD(1): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(2): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(3): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# ./myopen -e -n  -f /dev/sg5 -d 30 &
[4] 3422
[3422:3351] /dev/sg5:exclude: Device or resource busy

[4]+  Exit 1                  ./myopen -e -n -f /dev/sg5 -d 30

[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
max_active_device=6(origin 1)
 def_reserved_size=32768
 >>> device=sg5 scsi5 chan=0 id=1 lun=0   em=0 sg_tablesize=55 excl=0
   FD(1): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(2): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
   FD(3): timeout=60000ms bufflen=32768 (res)sgat=1 low_dma=0
   cmd_q=0 f_packid=0 k_orphan=0 closed=0
     No requests active
[root@vacaowol5 16835013]# cat /proc/scsi/sg/debug
[1]   Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30
[2]-  Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30
[3]+  Done                    ./myopen -f /dev/sg5 -d 30


>
> BTW the standard block driver (e.g. /dev/sdc) is broken
> in exactly the same way, according to my tests.
>
> Doug Gilbert
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-05  9:18 [PATCH] sg: atomize check and set sdp->exclude in sg_open vaughan
2013-06-05 13:27 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 16:16   ` vaughan
2013-06-05 15:41     ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-06  7:19       ` vaughan
2013-06-06  7:29         ` vaughan
2013-06-17 13:10       ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition when do exclusive open vaughan
2013-06-26  1:37         ` vaughan
2013-07-05  1:59           ` vaughan
2013-07-05 17:39         ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-06 17:24           ` vaughan
2013-07-07 19:53             ` [PATCH v3 " vaughan
2013-07-15 20:37               ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:19                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:19                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:24                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-22  3:39                       ` [PATCH v5 " Vaughan Cao
     [not found]                       ` <CAMvaAQnFy0WiXHaNtAB1KPLK-7yj1AHh=_Pw4MBm0=_ecpoAoQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-22 16:52                         ` [PATCH v4 " Jörn Engel
2013-07-17 15:34                   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-19 21:26                     ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-22  3:41                       ` [PATCH v5 " Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                   ` [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 1/4] [SCSI] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28  4:00                       ` James Bottomley
2013-08-28 10:07                         ` [PATCH v6 0/4][SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 1/4] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:26                             ` James Bottomley
2013-08-29  2:00                               ` [PATCH v7 0/4][SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] sg: use rwsem to solve race during exclusive open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-29  2:00                                 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 2/4] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 3/4] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-08-28 10:07                           ` [PATCH v6 4/4] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 2/4] [SCSI] sg: no need sg_open_exclusive_lock Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 3/4] [SCSI] sg: checking sdp->detached isn't protected when open Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22  4:40                     ` [PATCH v5 4/4] [SCSI] sg: push file descriptor list locking down to per-device locking Vaughan Cao
2013-07-22 17:03                     ` [PATCH v5 0/4] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition in sg_open Jörn Engel
2013-07-25 15:32                       ` vaughan
2013-07-25 20:33                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-07-31  4:40                           ` vaughan
2013-08-01  5:01                       ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-03  5:25                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-05  2:19                           ` vaughan [this message]
2013-08-05 20:52                             ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-13  2:46                               ` vaughan
2013-08-13  3:16                                 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-27  8:16                                   ` vaughan
2013-08-27 13:13                                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-08-28  1:50                                       ` vaughan
2013-07-15 17:25             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] [SCSI] sg: fix race condition when do exclusive open Jörn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51FF0BC0.5020702@oracle.com \
    --to=vaughan.cao@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).