From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Limit overall SCSI EH runtime Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: <5241FB6E.6010106@gmail.com> References: <1372661455-122384-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1373488528.7420.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5201ECAD.7000703@cn.fujitsu.com> <521F4768.5010807@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.216.52]:37730 "EHLO mail-qa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753836Ab3IXUwA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:52:00 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k4so2851186qaq.4 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:52:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <521F4768.5010807@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke , James Bottomley Cc: Ren Mingxin , emilne@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart van Assche , Joern Engel On 08/29/2013 09:06 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Hi James, > > On 08/07/2013 08:43 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote: >> Hi, James: >> >> On 07/11/2013 04:35 AM, Ewan Milne wrote: >>> Looks good. We have been testing this extensively. >>> >>> Acked-by: Ewan D. Milne >> Do you think this patchset can be applied? If so, When? Perhaps you >> are waiting for someone's feedback? >> >> We've also tested and got the duration could be shortened from 6m26s >> to 44s when 'eh_deadline' was set as 1s(the minimum value of timeout) >> and 16M data were written(I/O processing time can be ignored - 0.7s). >> >> As Ewan said, this is efficient to fast failover policy for redundant >> environments. >> >> Thanks, >> Ren > Any objections to this patchset? > I have other patchsets pending (eg asynchronous command aborts) > which are based on this one. > So it would be good to have a status here. > > Cheers, > > Hannes Any progress on this patchset? Seems to have gone dormant? thanks! Ric