From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH] usb-storage: scsiglue: Changing the command result
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:07:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52456E16.7060007@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52441C1F.8020200@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2606 bytes --]
Hi,
There was a recent commit in mainline for the scsi devices which do not
respond properly to medium access command:
commit 18a4d0a22ed6c54b67af7718c305cd010f09ddf8
[SCSI] Handle disk devices which can not process medium access commands
We have experienced several devices which fail in a fashion we do not
currently handle gracefully in SCSI. After a failure these devices will
respond to the SCSI primary command set (INQUIRY, TEST UNIT READY, etc.)
but any command accessing the storage medium will time out.
I came across a USB drive which showed similar problem and what I see is
usb storage is still not able to cope with such devices properly.
The control flow downwards is like:
scsi_times_out --> Setting cmd->result as DID_TIME_OUT
scsi_error_handler
scsi_unjam_host
scsi_eh_abort_cmds
command_abort (sets US_FLIDX_TIMED_OUT for us->dflags
calls stop_transport,
and waits for) usb_stor_control_thread (which is waiting for
transport call to return inside
usb_stor_invoke_transport)
both usb_stor_control_thread and
usb_stor_invoke_transport
check for us->dflags timed_out bit and
set the result as DID_ABORT
and signal completion for command_abort
to complete
......
sd_eh_action
checks for cmd->result and finds out that it's DID_ABORT rather than
DID_TIME_OUT.
This patch updates the command result to be TIME_OUT explicitly before
returning from command_abort in scsiglue.c.
I would like to know if this patch can work out for such USB Storage
devices? What would be the better way to do the same?
Regards,
Vishal Annapurve
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: usb_storage_scsi_medium_access_timeout.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1148 bytes --]
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb-storage: Changing the command result
This change updates the returned result to scsi layer to use
DID_TIMEOUT flag as a result status rather than DID_ABORT for
commands aborted due to timeout.
Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
index a74e9d8..e7b532e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
@@ -353,6 +353,15 @@ static int command_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *srb)
/* Wait for the aborted command to finish */
wait_for_completion(&us->notify);
+ /* Given that this bit would be only set in case of timedout
+ * command, we can return with DID_TIME_OUT, as scsi layer needs
+ * to use this result rather than DID_ABORT.
+ * This is a WR to avoid removing DID_ABORT altogether
+ * and before the final control goes to scsi layer change the
+ * result to be timedout.
+ */
+ us->srb->result = DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
+
return SUCCESS;
}
--
1.8.4
parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <52441C1F.8020200@nvidia.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52456E16.7060007@nvidia.com \
--to=vannapurve@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).