From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
'James Bottomley' <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] sd: call blk_pm_runtime_init before add_disk
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:22:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5256399C.10105@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04811251e7b06dd74849872257d9bb7c.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Sujit has found a race condition that would make q->nr_pending
unbalanced, it occurs as Sujit explained:
"
sd_probe_async() ->
add_disk() ->
disk_add_event() ->
schedule(disk_events_workfn)
sd_revalidate_disk()
blk_pm_runtime_init()
return;
Let's say the disk_events_workfn() calls sd_check_events() which tries
to send test_unit_ready() and because of sd_revalidate_disk() trying to
send another commands the test_unit_ready() might be re-queued as the
tagged command queuing is disabled.
So the race condition is -
Thread 1 | Thread 2
sd_revalidate_disk() | sd_check_events()
...nr_pending = 0 as q->dev = NULL| scsi_queue_insert()
blk_runtime_pm_init() | blk_pm_requeue_request() ->
| nr_pending = -1 since
| q->dev != NULL
"
The problem is, the test_unit_ready request doesn't get counted the
first time it is queued, so the later decrement of q->nr_pending in
blk_pm_requeue_request makes it unbalanced.
Fix this by calling blk_pm_runtime_init before add_disk so that all
requests initiated there will all be counted.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index e62d17d..5693f6d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2854,6 +2854,7 @@ static void sd_probe_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
gd->events |= DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
}
+ blk_pm_runtime_init(sdp->request_queue, dev);
add_disk(gd);
if (sdkp->capacity)
sd_dif_config_host(sdkp);
@@ -2862,7 +2863,6 @@ static void sd_probe_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Attached SCSI %sdisk\n",
sdp->removable ? "removable " : "");
- blk_pm_runtime_init(sdp->request_queue, dev);
scsi_autopm_put_device(sdp);
put_device(&sdkp->dev);
}
--
1.8.4.12.g2ea3df6
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-09 8:32 (unknown), sthumma
2013-10-09 8:32 ` Race condition in block layer runtime PM init and scsi disk driver sthumma
2013-10-09 9:07 ` Aaron Lu
2013-10-10 4:55 ` sthumma
2013-10-10 5:22 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5256399C.10105@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).