From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: vaughan <vaughan.cao@oracle.com>, Madper Xie <cxie@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] 12.864681 BUG: lock held when returning to user space!
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:41:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525F1601.8080906@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381929897.1864.0.camel@dabdike>
On 13-10-16 09:24 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 09:45 -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> On 13-10-08 02:44 AM, vaughan wrote:
>>> Hi Madper,
>>>
>>> CC to Douglas to get comments.
>>> I use the rw_semaphore o_sem to protect excl open, introduced in commit
>>> 15b06f9a02406e5460001db6d5af5c738cd3d4e7 since v3.12-rc1.
>>> Is it forbidden to do like that in kernel?...
>>
>> It appears you can not (allow sg_open() to hold a semaphore
>> then return to the user space). So you will need to do some
>> rework on that patch or revert it.
>
> OK, there being no reply on this, I'll do the revert ... that's all four
> patches, correct?
That seems to be the case. Vaughan acknowledged the
problem and forwarded it to me 8 days ago. Yes, it
seems to be a "no-no" to hold a any kernel semaphore
when returning to the user space; in this case from
sg_open(). I was hoping a revised patch might
appear from Vaughan but to date that has not been
the case. So with only a few weeks to go before
lk 3.12 is released, reverting the whole 4 patches
in that series seems to be the safest course.
Also without a new patch from Vaughan in the next few
weeks he may also miss the opportunity of getting
his improved O_EXCL logic into the lk 3.13 series.
Thinking about how to solve this problem: a field could
be added to 'struct sg_device' with one of three states:
no_opens, non_excl_opens and excl_open. It could be
manipulated by sg_open() and sg_release() like a
read-write semaphore. And the faulty 'struct
rw_semaphore o_sem' in sg_device could be replaced by a
normal semaphore to protect the manipulation of the new
three-state field.
Doug Gilbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8761tilrl0.fsf@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <874n8s2tjz.fsf@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <5253A9E7.5030707@oracle.com>
2013-10-08 13:45 ` [Bug] 12.864681 BUG: lock held when returning to user space! Douglas Gilbert
2013-10-16 13:24 ` James Bottomley
2013-10-16 22:41 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2013-10-17 2:52 ` vaughan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525F1601.8080906@interlog.com \
--to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cxie@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vaughan.cao@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).