From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Ren Mingxin <renmx@cn.fujitsu.com>, Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] scsi: improved eh timeout handler
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:27:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527E5452.6070109@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383986131.18681.15.camel@dabdike>
On 11/09/2013 09:35 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 07:45 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 11/06/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2013 10:48 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> On 11/05/2013 08:19 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>>>> On 11/04/2013 11:05 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + scmd->eh_eflags |= SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED;
>>>>>> + SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
>>>>>> + scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
>>>>>> + "scmd %p abort scheduled\n", scmd));
>>>>>> + schedule_delayed_work(&scmd->abort_work, HZ / 100);
>>>>>> + return SUCCESS;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we want to use our own workqueue_struct with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set?
>>>>>
>>>> Errm. Yes, why?
>>>>
>>>> I must admit I'm not _that_ familiar with workqueues ...
>>>> Care to explain?
>>>>
>>>
>>> We all share the above workqueue_structs pool of threads, so if we get
>>> stuck behind code doing GFP_KERNEL allocs that end up needing to write
>>> data to the disk we are now trying to aborts on, then we could get
>>> stuck. With WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, we have our own backup thread that gets
>>> created at workqueue_struct create time which can get used in cases like
>>> that so we can always make forward progress.
>>>
>> Ah. Right. Yes, that makes sense.
>>
>> I guess I'll have to redo the patches _yet again_.
>
> So when were you going to send the redo? The merge window is now open
> and Linus was shirty with me about a late merge last time ...
>
Patch is prepared, I'll just have to run a verification on it.
Will be sending the updated patchset on Monday.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-09 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 7:05 [PATCHv10 0/5] New EH command timeout handler Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 7:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: Fix erratic device offline during EH Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 7:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: improved eh timeout handler Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 19:19 ` Mike Christie
2013-11-06 6:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-06 17:23 ` Mike Christie
2013-11-07 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-07 18:33 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-11-08 15:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-09 8:35 ` James Bottomley
2013-11-09 15:27 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2013-11-06 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-07 6:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 7:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: Unlock accesses to eh_deadline Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 7:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: Set the minimum valid value of 'eh_deadline' as 0 Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-05 7:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Update documentation Hannes Reinecke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-11 12:44 [PATCHv11 0/5] New EH command timeout handler Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-11 12:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: improved eh " Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-11 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-11 14:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-12 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-12 7:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527E5452.6070109@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=renmx@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).