* [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" [not found] ` <5294255E.7040105@gmail.com> @ 2013-11-27 2:29 ` Chen Gang 2013-12-01 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen Gang @ 2013-11-27 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bottomley, linux-scsi; +Cc: rkuo, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org the macro "SP" is too common to make conflict with some architectures, so recommend to add prefix for it. The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> --- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index 7bd7f0d..f78e21b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { mempool_t *pool; }; -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } +#define SCSILIB_SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) #endif static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { - SP(8), - SP(16), + SCSILIB_SP(8), + SCSILIB_SP(16), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) - SP(32), + SCSILIB_SP(32), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) - SP(64), + SCSILIB_SP(64), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) - SP(128), + SCSILIB_SP(128), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) #endif #endif #endif #endif - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) + SCSILIB_SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) }; -#undef SP +#undef SCSILIB_SP struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; -- 1.7.7.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-11-27 2:29 ` [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" Chen Gang @ 2013-12-01 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche 2013-12-02 0:34 ` Chen Gang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bart Van Assche @ 2013-12-01 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen Gang, Bottomley, linux-scsi; +Cc: rkuo, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/27/13 03:29, Chen Gang wrote: > the macro "SP" is too common to make conflict with some architectures, > so recommend to add prefix for it. > > The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): > > CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] > arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > index 7bd7f0d..f78e21b 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { > mempool_t *pool; > }; > > -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } > +#define SCSILIB_SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } > #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) > #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) > #endif > static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { > - SP(8), > - SP(16), > + SCSILIB_SP(8), > + SCSILIB_SP(16), > #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) > - SP(32), > + SCSILIB_SP(32), > #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) > - SP(64), > + SCSILIB_SP(64), > #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) > - SP(128), > + SCSILIB_SP(128), > #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) > #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) > #endif > #endif > #endif > #endif > - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) > + SCSILIB_SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) > }; > -#undef SP > +#undef SCSILIB_SP > > struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; Sorry but the "SCSILIB_SP" name doesn't look very descriptive to me. There are probably better choices possible. How about using e.g. SG_POOL() instead ? Bart. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-12-01 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche @ 2013-12-02 0:34 ` Chen Gang 2013-12-02 0:49 ` James Bottomley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen Gang @ 2013-12-02 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Van Assche; +Cc: Bottomley, linux-scsi, rkuo, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/2013 12:17 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 11/27/13 03:29, Chen Gang wrote: >> the macro "SP" is too common to make conflict with some architectures, >> so recommend to add prefix for it. >> >> The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): >> >> CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o >> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] >> arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >> index 7bd7f0d..f78e21b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >> @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { >> mempool_t *pool; >> }; >> >> -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } >> +#define SCSILIB_SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) >> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) >> #endif >> static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { >> - SP(8), >> - SP(16), >> + SCSILIB_SP(8), >> + SCSILIB_SP(16), >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) >> - SP(32), >> + SCSILIB_SP(32), >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) >> - SP(64), >> + SCSILIB_SP(64), >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) >> - SP(128), >> + SCSILIB_SP(128), >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) >> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) >> #endif >> #endif >> #endif >> #endif >> - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) >> + SCSILIB_SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) >> }; >> -#undef SP >> +#undef SCSILIB_SP >> >> struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; > > Sorry but the "SCSILIB_SP" name doesn't look very descriptive to me. > There are probably better choices possible. How about using e.g. > SG_POOL() instead ? > That sounds good to me, I will send patch v2, tomorrow (today I have to do some another urgent things, if this patch is also urgent, please help send). :-) Thanks. -- Chen Gang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-12-02 0:34 ` Chen Gang @ 2013-12-02 0:49 ` James Bottomley 2013-12-02 10:14 ` Chen Gang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: James Bottomley @ 2013-12-02 0:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen Gang Cc: Bart Van Assche, Bottomley, linux-scsi, rkuo, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 08:34 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > On 12/02/2013 12:17 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 11/27/13 03:29, Chen Gang wrote: > >> the macro "SP" is too common to make conflict with some architectures, > >> so recommend to add prefix for it. > >> > >> The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): > >> > >> CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o > >> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] > >> arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition > >> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > >> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > >> index 7bd7f0d..f78e21b 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > >> @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { > >> mempool_t *pool; > >> }; > >> > >> -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } > >> +#define SCSILIB_SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } > >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) > >> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) > >> #endif > >> static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { > >> - SP(8), > >> - SP(16), > >> + SCSILIB_SP(8), > >> + SCSILIB_SP(16), > >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) > >> - SP(32), > >> + SCSILIB_SP(32), > >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) > >> - SP(64), > >> + SCSILIB_SP(64), > >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) > >> - SP(128), > >> + SCSILIB_SP(128), > >> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) > >> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) > >> #endif > >> #endif > >> #endif > >> #endif > >> - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) > >> + SCSILIB_SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) > >> }; > >> -#undef SP > >> +#undef SCSILIB_SP > >> > >> struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; > > > > Sorry but the "SCSILIB_SP" name doesn't look very descriptive to me. > > There are probably better choices possible. How about using e.g. > > SG_POOL() instead ? > > > > That sounds good to me, I will send patch v2, tomorrow (today I have > to do some another urgent things, if this patch is also urgent, please > help send). :-) No, this is the wrong thing to do. Exported headers should be namespace protected, so the thing wrong is what's exporting the problem to us, namely hexagon. James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-12-02 0:49 ` James Bottomley @ 2013-12-02 10:14 ` Chen Gang 2013-12-02 21:32 ` rkuo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen Gang @ 2013-12-02 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: James Bottomley Cc: Bart Van Assche, Bottomley, linux-scsi, rkuo, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/2013 08:49 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 08:34 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 12/02/2013 12:17 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> On 11/27/13 03:29, Chen Gang wrote: >>>> the macro "SP" is too common to make conflict with some architectures, >>>> so recommend to add prefix for it. >>>> >>>> The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): >>>> >>>> CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o >>>> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] >>>> arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition >>>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >>>> index 7bd7f0d..f78e21b 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c >>>> @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { >>>> mempool_t *pool; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } >>>> +#define SCSILIB_SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } >>>> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) >>>> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) >>>> #endif >>>> static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { >>>> - SP(8), >>>> - SP(16), >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(8), >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(16), >>>> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) >>>> - SP(32), >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(32), >>>> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) >>>> - SP(64), >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(64), >>>> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) >>>> - SP(128), >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(128), >>>> #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) >>>> #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) >>>> #endif >>>> #endif >>>> #endif >>>> #endif >>>> - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) >>>> + SCSILIB_SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) >>>> }; >>>> -#undef SP >>>> +#undef SCSILIB_SP >>>> >>>> struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; >>> >>> Sorry but the "SCSILIB_SP" name doesn't look very descriptive to me. >>> There are probably better choices possible. How about using e.g. >>> SG_POOL() instead ? >>> >> >> That sounds good to me, I will send patch v2, tomorrow (today I have >> to do some another urgent things, if this patch is also urgent, please >> help send). :-) > > No, this is the wrong thing to do. Exported headers should be namespace > protected, so the thing wrong is what's exporting the problem to us, > namely hexagon. > If one issue occurs, normally, both sides need improvement. For our issue: - need try to keep uapi no touch ("arch/hexagon/uapi/asm/registers.h"). - improving our module is much easier than improving hexagon. - for 'SP', it is really short enough to like a register name. SG_POOL seems more suitable for our 'sgpool' related operations. It will be better to improve hexagon too, but it is not quit easy (maybe have to bear it), it is uapi :-( Thanks -- Chen Gang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-12-02 10:14 ` Chen Gang @ 2013-12-02 21:32 ` rkuo 2013-12-03 11:42 ` Chen Gang 2013-12-04 2:42 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: use SG_POOL instead of SP Chen Gang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: rkuo @ 2013-12-02 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen Gang Cc: James Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Bottomley, linux-scsi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:14:33PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > If one issue occurs, normally, both sides need improvement. > > For our issue: > > - need try to keep uapi no touch ("arch/hexagon/uapi/asm/registers.h"). > > - improving our module is much easier than improving hexagon. > > - for 'SP', it is really short enough to like a register name. > SG_POOL seems more suitable for our 'sgpool' related operations. > > > It will be better to improve hexagon too, but it is not quit easy (maybe > have to bear it), it is uapi :-( I can't speak for SCSI, but that define in Hexagon isn't really used outside of that file anyways (the two SP macros themselves). I'm also pretty sure the userspace isn't currently using it anyways. Seeing as it's not really buying us anything, I'm fine with just removing it and continuing to review the other defines. I'll make that change and test it locally. Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" 2013-12-02 21:32 ` rkuo @ 2013-12-03 11:42 ` Chen Gang 2013-12-04 2:42 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: use SG_POOL instead of SP Chen Gang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen Gang @ 2013-12-03 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rkuo Cc: James Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Bottomley, linux-scsi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/03/2013 05:32 AM, rkuo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:14:33PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> If one issue occurs, normally, both sides need improvement. >> >> For our issue: >> >> - need try to keep uapi no touch ("arch/hexagon/uapi/asm/registers.h"). >> >> - improving our module is much easier than improving hexagon. >> >> - for 'SP', it is really short enough to like a register name. >> SG_POOL seems more suitable for our 'sgpool' related operations. >> >> >> It will be better to improve hexagon too, but it is not quit easy (maybe >> have to bear it), it is uapi :-( > > I can't speak for SCSI, but that define in Hexagon isn't really used outside > of that file anyways (the two SP macros themselves). I'm also pretty sure > the userspace isn't currently using it anyways. Seeing as it's not really > buying us anything, I'm fine with just removing it and continuing to review > the other defines. I'll make that change and test it locally. > OK, thanks. > > Thanks, > Richard Kuo > > -- Chen Gang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: use SG_POOL instead of SP 2013-12-02 21:32 ` rkuo 2013-12-03 11:42 ` Chen Gang @ 2013-12-04 2:42 ` Chen Gang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chen Gang @ 2013-12-04 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rkuo Cc: James Bottomley, Bart Van Assche, Bottomley, linux-scsi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org the macro SP is too common to make conflict with others, so recommend to use another more readable and non-conflict macro SG_POOL instead of (and recommend others do not use SP either). The related warning (with allmodconfig for hexagon): CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.o drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:46:0: warning: "SP" redefined [enabled by default] arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/registers.h:9:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> --- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index 7bd7f0d..19967fa 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c @@ -43,28 +43,28 @@ struct scsi_host_sg_pool { mempool_t *pool; }; -#define SP(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } +#define SG_POOL(x) { x, "sgpool-" __stringify(x) } #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS < 32) #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too small (must be 32 or greater) #endif static struct scsi_host_sg_pool scsi_sg_pools[] = { - SP(8), - SP(16), + SG_POOL(8), + SG_POOL(16), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 32) - SP(32), + SG_POOL(32), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 64) - SP(64), + SG_POOL(64), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 128) - SP(128), + SG_POOL(128), #if (SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS > 256) #error SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS is too large (256 MAX) #endif #endif #endif #endif - SP(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) + SG_POOL(SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS) }; -#undef SP +#undef SG_POOL struct kmem_cache *scsi_sdb_cache; -- 1.7.7.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-04 2:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <528AEFB7.4060301@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20131125011938.GB18921@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <5292B845.3010404@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5292B8A0.7020409@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5294255E.7040105@gmail.com>
2013-11-27 2:29 ` [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" Chen Gang
2013-12-01 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-12-02 0:34 ` Chen Gang
2013-12-02 0:49 ` James Bottomley
2013-12-02 10:14 ` Chen Gang
2013-12-02 21:32 ` rkuo
2013-12-03 11:42 ` Chen Gang
2013-12-04 2:42 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: use SG_POOL instead of SP Chen Gang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).