From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: status of block-integrity
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:14:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CCFADB.6080909@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1a9f7wjqr.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On 01/07/2014 10:43 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
>
> Hannes> Plus (as hch rightly pointed out) as there is no defined
> Hannes> userland interface the question is why we bother with all the
> Hannes> DIX stuff in the block layer.
>
> Because it catches problems in the path between block layer and HBA
> ASIC? FWIW, we find more issues there than we do between initiator and
> target.
>
But how should it do that exactly?
As there is no user (apart from oracleasm) no-one can attach
protection information to any data, so even the most dedicated admin
cannot exercise this path, let alone find issues here.
> API issues aside, another reason adoption has been slow is that very few
> applications truly care about this stuff. The current approach in which
> data is protected when the I/O is submitted by the filesystem is good
> enough for most things. Saves the filesystem people the trouble of
> dealing with it too.
>
> In reality there are only a handful of applications that would actually
> benefit from an explicit userland API. Mostly in the database
> department. All the potential consumers of an interface I talked to
> wanted to use aio so that's why we've focused our efforts there.
>
aio is perfectly fine; all I care is to have _any_ way of feeding
protection information into the kernel.
> Both Darrick and I have been busy with other projects the last little
> while. I'll start looking at this again when I'm done with copy
> offload...
>
Speaking of which, are there any patches?
Doug Gilbert and I are currently discussing LID4 / ROD Token copy
for sg3_utils and the block layer, so any patches would be very
helpful here.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-22 19:21 status of block-integrity Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-22 20:45 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-12-23 13:35 ` Martin K. Petersen
2013-12-23 13:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-31 19:41 ` berthiaume, wayne
2014-01-07 8:28 ` Ric Wheeler
2014-01-07 13:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07 23:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-08 0:05 ` James Bottomley
2014-01-08 15:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-03 15:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-03 20:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-07 1:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-01-07 7:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-07 21:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-08 7:14 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-01-08 15:23 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-09 11:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-01-10 1:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-07 15:06 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CCFADB.6080909@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).