From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND] interest in blk-mq, scsi-mq, dm-cache, dm-thinp, dm-* Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:54:01 +0100 Message-ID: <52DF9539.9060206@acm.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from yahoo.smtp.stone-is.be ([5.134.1.31]:53904 "EHLO yahoo.smtp.stone-is.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752758AbaAVJyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:54:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Giridhar Malavali , Mike Snitzer Cc: linux-scsi On 01/16/14 23:35, Giridhar Malavali wrote: > On 1/10/14 10:27 AM, "Mike Snitzer" wrote: >> I would like to attend to participate in discussions related to topics >> listed in the subject. As a maintainer of DM I'd be interested to >> learn/discuss areas that should become a development focus in the months >> following LSF. > > +1 for scsi-mq. (removed lsf-pc from CC-list) Hello Giridhar, I definitely appreciate QLogic's continuous efforts to improve performance of their initiator and target drivers. Via your e-mail I learned that QLogic is looking at scsi-mq, which is great news. However, the following issue might have to be addressed before the qla2xxx driver can fully take advantage of the scsi-mq work: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69201. It would be appreciated if someone could have a look at the measurements described in that bugzilla entry. Thanks, Bart.