From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
To: Duncan Gibb <duncangibb@uk.dmgworldmedia.com>
Cc: "Cress, Andrew R" <andrew.r.cress@intel.com>,
Rohit Gupta <rohit@davsys.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: aic79xx U320 + e1000 Intel hangs on Idual Xeon 7505
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:55:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530360000.1049993706@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1049925671.16881.104.camel@astrognat>
> On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 21:27, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>
> JG> The latest driver is 1.3.6:
>
> I superimposed your 2.4-20030328 driver over my kernel tree and
> rebuilt. It still locked up :-(
Do you have the nmi_watchdog enabled? What bus speed are you running
for the aic7902 and the gig-E card? Are the on the same physical PCI/PCI-X
bus?
> I tried lowering global tag depth to 4 (which I presume is a low number,
> but I don't really know what I'm doing). And it still locks up.
> Moreover, according to /proc/scsi/aic79xx/[01], the driver has
> negotiated "Max Tagged Openings 0" with all the devices on this bus.
That seems really wierd - like you disabled disconnection.
> I noticed /proc/scsi/aic79xx/1 correctly refers to the controller as
> Channel B, but all the device info says Channel A. Hope this doesn't
> mean it's getting scsi0 and scsi1 mixed up at a lower level.
Yes, that is a bit confusing. The two channels are actually two independent,
single channel, controllers. The user doesn't know that, and expects the
names to match those silk-screened on the card. I'll review the code to
see if I can make it less confusing (perhaps just omit the channel identifier).
> My other theory is that all the devices on this bus are removable in one
> form or another, and hence are being polled for media changes. The
> actions which cause the bus/driver to lock up are things which need a
> long period (several seconds) of data transfer - scanning in colour,
> writing a CD. Could the disconnect logic be getting screwed up
> somewhere? How could I test that?
A good start would be to send me privately (no need to spam the list) the
output of "cat /proc/scsi/aic79xx/*" and "cat /proc/scsi/scsi" as well
as a dmesg from the system. From the last trace you sent, it did look
like we timed out while a command without the disconnection privledge was
out on the bus, but its not clear why yet. If you compile the driver
with debugging enabled and a debug mask of 8, I can also see the content
of the serial eeprom to see if the settings are strange.
--
Justin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-10 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-09 19:26 aic79xx U320 + e1000 Intel hangs on Idual Xeon 7505 Cress, Andrew R
2003-04-09 20:23 ` Duncan Gibb
2003-04-09 20:27 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-04-09 22:01 ` Duncan Gibb
2003-04-10 16:55 ` Justin T. Gibbs [this message]
2003-04-10 21:00 ` Duncan Gibb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-09 15:47 Duncan Gibb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530360000.1049993706@aslan.btc.adaptec.com \
--to=gibbs@scsiguy.com \
--cc=andrew.r.cress@intel.com \
--cc=duncangibb@uk.dmgworldmedia.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rohit@davsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox