public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspicious self-assignment in lpfc
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:19:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53065539.4040704@emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140218174211.GA17778@redhat.com>

yeah - this is pretty silly.  I'll cut a patch to remove the lines.

-- james s


On 2/18/2014 12:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Looking through coverity reports, and it flagged lpfc_read_fcf_conn_tbl()
> due to the following patch..
>
> commit df0d085fdd2e7c39d1249c2d4ad6b3e176efb60c
> Author: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
> Date:   Fri May 31 17:05:08 2013 -0400
>
>      [SCSI] lpfc 8.3.40: Fixed FCoE connection list vlan identifier and add FCF list debug
>      
>      Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
>      Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
> index 0f6e2548f35d..0309cc15aad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
> @@ -6158,12 +6158,44 @@ lpfc_read_fcf_conn_tbl(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>                  memcpy(&conn_entry->conn_rec, &conn_rec[i],
>                          sizeof(struct lpfc_fcf_conn_rec));
>                  conn_entry->conn_rec.vlan_tag =
> -                       le16_to_cpu(conn_entry->conn_rec.vlan_tag) & 0xFFF;
> +                       conn_entry->conn_rec.vlan_tag;
>                  conn_entry->conn_rec.flags =
> -                       le16_to_cpu(conn_entry->conn_rec.flags);
> +                       conn_entry->conn_rec.flags;
>                  list_add_tail(&conn_entry->list,
>                          &phba->fcf_conn_rec_list);
>
>
> Now that we're not caring about endianness, those two assignments are redundant.
> I gather this has passed testing, because surely someone would have complained by now,
> but can they be removed, or should they be doing something else entirely ?
>
> 	Dave
>
>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2014-02-20 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18 17:42 suspicious self-assignment in lpfc Dave Jones
2014-02-20 19:19 ` James Smart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53065539.4040704@emulex.com \
    --to=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox