From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"jlinton@tributary.com" <jlinton@tributary.com>,
"dgilbert@interlog.com" <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
"kay@vrfy.org" <kay@vrfy.org>,
"kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi" <kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add EVPD page 0x83 to sysfs
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:39:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5319CC15.2070703@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394190098.14365.7.camel@dabdike>
On 03/07/2014 12:01 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 11:51 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 03/07/2014 11:39 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 10:01 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> So the only 'proper' solution would be to add a bitmap of supported
>>>> pages; however, this would be 256 bits = 32 bytes of additional
>>>> space required for struct sdev.
>>>> Which I'm a bit reluctant do to, as it'll be a sparse array in most
>>>> cases, adding to quite some wasted space.
>>>
>>> Why per sdev? Isn't it per target? The supported EVPD page list
>>> shouldn't really vary for luns of the same target unless something very
>>> strange is happening in the array.
>>>
>> Spec says it's per LUN:
>
> Specs say a lot of "interesting" things. The question is what's common
> practise in the field.
>
>> 7.8.16 Supported VPD Pages VPD page
>> The Supported VDP Pages VPD page contains a list of the VPD page
>> codes supported by the logical unit (see
>> table 637).
>>
>> so we shouldn't really make any assumptions about what might be
>> sensible or strange.
>
> The cardreader case is the one I think causes problems for this. Going
> completely the opposite direction, why do we need to cache this at
> all? ... it's fairly simple to request each time and it avoids worrying
> about the data changing because of a change in the array.
>
Storage arrays more often than not do this, too. Especially those
which export a management device.
(block-device specific VPD pages really do not make sense on a
management device)
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 10:07 [PATCHv7 0/3] Display EVPD pages in sysfs Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-13 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_sysfs: Implement 'is_visible' callback Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-13 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add EVPD page 0x83 to sysfs Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-28 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-05 7:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-05 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-06 9:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-07 10:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-07 10:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-07 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-07 10:39 ` James Bottomley
2014-03-07 10:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-07 11:01 ` James Bottomley
2014-03-07 11:18 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-03-07 13:39 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-03-07 10:40 ` James Bottomley
2014-03-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-07 10:57 ` James Bottomley
2014-02-13 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add EVPD page 0x80 " Hannes Reinecke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-13 10:27 [PATCHv7 0/3][Resend] Display EVPD pages in sysfs Hannes Reinecke
2014-02-13 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add EVPD page 0x83 to sysfs Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-02 8:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-03-05 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-02 8:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-03-05 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5319CC15.2070703@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=jlinton@tributary.com \
--cc=kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox