From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: SCSI "staging" tree for linux-next?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:38:20 +0200
Message-ID: <537614CC.6020602@suse.de>
References: <20140515052645.GA26266@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140515052645.GA26266@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

On 05/15/2014 07:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> we're past -rc5 and no SCSI patches have been collected for 3.16 yet,
> despite a lot of patches including a lot of reviewed ones pending on =
the
> list.
>
> I'd really love to get at least some testing for all the work that
> sometimes has been pending for months in linux-next and would offer t=
o
> put together a tree of reviewed patches for linux-next.  Is this fine
> with you?
>
Seconded. Having a staging tree would make my life _so_ much easier.

Cheers,

Hannes
--=20
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)