From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: scsi error handling thread and REQUEST SENSE Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 13:26:21 +0200 Message-ID: <5379EA5D.2040700@acm.org> References: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402956F17E1F@G4W3202.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1400270713.3813.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5379C1B2.2040600@suse.de> <5379DD04.9020303@acm.org> <5379DEF4.9000301@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:38684 "EHLO andre.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753685AbaESL0X (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 07:26:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5379DEF4.9000301@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Hannes Reinecke , Bart Van Assche , emilne@redhat.com, "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" Cc: "James Bottomley (jbottomley@parallels.com)" , Christoph Hellwig , "scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On 05/19/14 12:37, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Plus this is just a test patch, nothing official yet. > I'm happy to include the changes for SRP if you can confirm that SRP > requires autosense. Hello Hannes, Since the SRP protocol supports returning sense data in the SRP response message and since every SRP target system I'm familiar with supports command queueing I think it is safe to enable the autosense feature in the SRP initiator driver. Bart.