From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:04:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5386090F.9060004@cs.wisc.edu> References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au> <20140520053928.GA1751@infradead.org> <20140521094636.515289e8@canb.auug.org.au> <1400639101.2481.19.camel@dabdike> <20140528105429.GA20549@infradead.org> <538602BB.2080609@cs.wisc.edu> <20140528155008.GA6913@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140528155008.GA6913@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vikas Chaudhary List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 05/28/2014 10:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:37:31AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 05/28/2014 05:54 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> be2iscsi: Fix processing cqe for cxn whose endpoint is freed >> >> I didn't look at your tree, but when this patch was posted on the list I >> think it had a bug. >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg74191.html > > I read through it and saw your comment, but so far it seems the patch > and especially the series does more good than harm. Did you see these patchsets: [PATCH 00/10] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k5: Updates for scsi "misc" branch and [PATCH 0/6] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k6: Updates for scsi "misc" branch ? I think they should be ok for your tree if you did not see any issues with them.