From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: emilne@redhat.com
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bart vn Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Do not complete timed-out command
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:53:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539FD7BC.6060602@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402943010.6423.67.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 06/16/2014 08:23 PM, Ewan Milne wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 14:01 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> There is a possible race between scsi_times_out() and scsi_done();
>> the LLDD is only notified about a timed out command by calling
>> scsi_try_to_abort_command(). Anytime before that the LLDD is
>> free to complete the command via scsi_done().
>> By this time, however, the command might've been timed-out already,
>> leaving us with a stale command in the error handler.
>> Fix this by separating out the two meanings of the
>> SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED flag; it's used to signal that
>> a) the asynchronous abort has been schedule
>> and
>> b) that an asynchronous abourt had been running, the command
>> has been retried, and has timed out again.
>>
>> This patch implements a new flag SCSI_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT to signal
>> that a command has run into a timeout (and thus can be used
>> to detect case b) above). The existing flag
>> SCSI_EH_CMD_ABORT_SCHEDULED is now restricted to signal
>> 'the asynchronous abort has been scheduled', and thus should be
>> checked in scsi_done() to avoid the mentioned race.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 6 ++++--
>> drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
>> index 88d46fe..7a58fbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
>> @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>> */
>> static void scsi_done(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>> {
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED))
>> + return;
>> trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_done(cmd);
>> blk_complete_request(cmd->request);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> index ff176a6..cde9c11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>> @@ -125,11 +125,13 @@ scmd_eh_abort_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>> scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
>> "scmd %p eh timeout, not aborting\n",
>> scmd));
>> + scmd->eh_eflags &= ~SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED;
>> } else {
>> SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
>> scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
>> "aborting command %p\n", scmd));
>> rtn = scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(sdev->host->hostt, scmd);
>> + scmd->eh_eflags &= ~SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED;
>> if (rtn == SUCCESS) {
>> scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
>> if (scsi_host_eh_past_deadline(sdev->host)) {
>> @@ -185,17 +187,17 @@ scsi_abort_command(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>> struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> - if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED) {
>> + if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT) {
>> /*
>> * Retry after abort failed, escalate to next level.
>> */
>> - scmd->eh_eflags &= ~SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED;
>> SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
>> scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
>> "scmd %p previous abort failed\n", scmd));
>> cancel_delayed_work(&scmd->abort_work);
>> return FAILED;
>> }
>> + scmd->eh_eflags |= SCSI_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT;
>>
>> /*
>> * Do not try a command abort if
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h b/drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h
>> index 48e5b65..66b387d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_priv.h
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct scsi_nl_hdr;
>> */
>> #define SCSI_EH_CANCEL_CMD 0x0001 /* Cancel this cmd */
>> #define SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED 0x0002 /* Abort has been scheduled */
>> +#define SCSI_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT 0x0004 /* Command has timed out */
>>
>> #define SCSI_SENSE_VALID(scmd) \
>> (((scmd)->sense_buffer[0] & 0x70) == 0x70)
>
> So, let me see if I follow the logic here...
>
> This patch changes the meaning of the SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED flag
> so that this flag is set during the time the queue_delayed_work() item
> is pending, until the LLD returns from the ->eh_abort_handler() call.
> It also adds a new flag SCSI_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT which is set (essentially)
> when the scmd has timed out, and prevent scsi_abort_command() from
> doing anything more than once (until scmd->eh_eflags is reset).
>
> I don't quite get why scsi_eh_scmd_add() tests SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED:
>
>> if (shost->eh_deadline != -1 && !shost->last_reset)
>> shost->last_reset = jiffies;
>>
>> ret = 1;
>> if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED)
>> eh_flag &= ~SCSI_EH_CANCEL_CMD;
>> scmd->eh_eflags |= eh_flag;
>> list_add_tail(&scmd->eh_entry, &shost->eh_cmd_q);
>> shost->host_failed++;
>> scsi_eh_wakeup(shost);
>
> ...since it seems like that flag wouldn't still be set by the time we
> get to the point where we are adding the scmd to the eh_cmd_q list.
>
> I'm also not sure why this case in scsi_decide_disposition():
>
>> case DID_ABORT:
>> if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED) {
>> scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
>> return SUCCESS;
>> }
>
> ...is looking at SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED, for similar reasons.
>
> The WARN_ON_ONCE() case in scsi_done():
>
>> static void scsi_done(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>> {
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED))
>> return;
>> trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_done(cmd);
>> blk_complete_request(cmd->request);
>> }
>
> ...seems like it should never go off because of the REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE
> logic in the block layer, assuming that logic is working.
>
> Can you verify this is the intended behavior, or perhaps explain
> what hole this patch is attempting to plug? It seems like it is
> dealing with the case of scsi_done() being called after a timeout
> but before the delayed_work abort mechanism runs. Is this actually
> what is happening?
>
> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
>
After the explanation from James B. it might indeed be handled by
REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE, and the real reason were the missing USB fixes.
I've sent a test kernel with the USB fixes to our customer and wait
for feedback there.
I'll be retracting this patchset for the time being.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-13 12:01 [PATCH 0/2] scsi command timeout fixes Hannes Reinecke
2014-06-13 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi_error: set DID_TIME_OUT correctly Hannes Reinecke
2014-06-13 14:32 ` Ewan Milne
2014-06-13 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-13 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Do not complete timed-out command Hannes Reinecke
2014-06-13 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-16 18:23 ` Ewan Milne
2014-06-17 5:53 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-06-19 14:43 ` Ewan Milne
2014-06-13 16:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] scsi command timeout fixes James Bottomley
2014-06-13 17:16 ` hch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539FD7BC.6060602@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).