From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: virtio_scsi LUN usage
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:29:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B6BA2C.80103@suse.de> (raw)
Hi Paolo,
virtio_scsi has this:
static void virtio_scsi_init_hdr(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_req *cmd,
struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
{
cmd->lun[0] = 1;
cmd->lun[1] = sc->device->id;
cmd->lun[2] = (sc->device->lun >> 8) | 0x40;
cmd->lun[3] = sc->device->lun & 0xff;
cmd->tag = (unsigned long)sc;
cmd->task_attr = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_SIMPLE;
cmd->prio = 0;
cmd->crn = 0;
}
As you might've seen I'm currently working on updating the SCSI
stack to use 64-bit LUNs.
So while virtio scsi is in principle capable of using 64-bit LUNs,
this peculiar usage makes it impossible to actually _use_ 64-bit LUNs.
Can't we get rid of this encoding and let the backend provide is
with correct numbers?
It should work if we were just to implement a REPORT_LUN intercept,
which sets the correct top two bytes in the command ... with that we
should be getting only the LUNs for a particular target, and could
then just use the provided LUN numbers as-is.
Long term I would prefer to have another 'target' field (preferably
also 64bit wide), which could be used to specify the target
directly. But that would require a spec change and feature flags
yadda yadda...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B6BA2C.80103@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox