Re: [PATCH 2/2] ib_srp: 64bit LUN fixes

[Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>]

On 07/04/2014 04:38 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 07/04/14 16:12, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 07/04/2014 03:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> I think storing the struct scsi_lun in the scsi_device is the right way
>>> to go ahead.  Any "accessors" for 8 or 32-bit LUNs should be simply
>>> enough by just ignoring bits in the array, so there's very little
>>> performance overhead.
>>>
>>> If we can get rid of the old scalar LUN field that would be great,
>>> and given that we know the printk format fallout already it doesn't look
>>> like too much work.  Do you want to look into this?
>>
>> Already working on it.
>
> That sounds great. Regarding the SRP initiator driver: if the "__be64
> lun" declarations in <scsi/srp.h> are changed into "struct scsi_lun lun"
> then that allows to encode / decode LUNs inside the SRP initiator
> without having to cast the address of these "lun" members into struct
> scsi_lun *. In case you would prefer me to have a look into this, please
> let me know.
>
That would be perfect.
Most of the HBAs supporting 64bit LUNs internally are already doing 
this.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html