From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Elliot <elliot@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Debugging scsi abort handling ?
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:48:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5400306B.5070007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540018E0.9050907@suse.de>
Il 29/08/2014 08:08, Hannes Reinecke ha scritto:
>>
> No.
> FAILED for any eh_abort_cmd() means that the TMF hasn't been sent.
> So the midlayer escalates to the next EH step.
> The command will only ever be re-issued once EH completes.
Then the answer to Hans's question is yes. It is legal to call
->scsi_done() after the eh_abort handler returns FAILED.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-23 14:52 Debugging scsi abort handling ? Hans de Goede
2014-08-23 15:42 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-08-24 8:39 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-23 21:05 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-24 8:46 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-24 21:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25 7:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-25 8:47 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-25 10:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-08-25 11:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-25 11:26 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-25 11:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-25 15:41 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-26 8:13 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-26 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-26 19:19 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-28 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-28 12:24 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-28 12:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-28 12:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-28 12:26 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-28 12:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-28 12:37 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-28 14:08 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-28 14:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-28 14:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-28 15:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-28 15:50 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-08-28 15:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-28 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29 4:39 ` Finn Thain
2014-08-29 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 7:48 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-08-29 10:14 ` Finn Thain
2014-08-29 10:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 10:39 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-29 10:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-28 12:21 ` Hans de Goede
2014-08-28 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-29 4:37 ` Finn Thain
2014-08-29 4:52 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-08-28 12:31 ` Martin Peschke
2014-08-28 14:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5400306B.5070007@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=elliot@hp.com \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox