From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise module removal
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:11:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540D72BB.2020100@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540B1CC6.8010800@interlog.com>
On 09/06/14 16:40, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 14-09-05 11:25 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> An LLD must call scsi_remove_host() directly or indirectly from the
>> module
>> cleanup path. scsi_remove_host() triggers a call to
>> blk_cleanup_queue(). That
>> last function sets the flag QUEUE_FLAG_DYING which prevents that new
>> I/O is
>> queued and waits until previously queued requests have finished before
>> returning.
>
> And they do call scsi_remove_host(). But they do that toward
> the end of their clean-up. The problem that I observed has
> already happened before that.
>
> IOW I think the QUEUE_FLAG_DYING state needs to be set and
> acknowledged as the first order of business by the code
> that implements 'rmmod LLD'.
Hello Doug,
In the scsi_debug driver scsi_remove_host() is called from inside the
sdebug_driver_remove() callback function. Unless I have missed something
it is not guaranteed that that callback function is invoked before
unloading of the scsi_debug driver has finished. I think most of the
code in sdebug_driver_remove() should be moved to sdebug_remove_adapter().
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-31 23:09 [PATCH] scsi_debug: deadlock between completions and surprise module removal Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-01 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-01 19:52 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-05 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-05 13:56 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-05 15:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-09-06 14:40 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-06 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-08 9:11 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-09-08 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-08 20:31 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-09 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-25 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-03 18:16 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540D72BB.2020100@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox