From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lk 3.17-rc4 blk_mq large write problems
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:42:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54109B81.5040302@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140910184004.GA14286@infradead.org>
On 09/10/2014 12:40 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:26:57PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> I have to. It's set by start_request, so we need to pass down the last
>>> argument to keep the old behavior. And once we pass the argument we
>>> can just it directly.
>>
>> It could still be done in the caller, but arguably, you'd have to do it
>> twice unless the ->queue_rq() call was rolled into a function.
>
> At which point we'd better do it the right way and just pass the flag
> instead of wasting a request flag for it. The other benefit is that
> there is a clear compile time API break for ->queue_rq that reminds
> people that need to start using blk_mq_start_request.
Yeah that's a good point, hopefully they will look up the commit and
figure out what to do. I'm not adverse to doing these two things at
once, but it should at least have a good mention of it in the changelog.
It's not even mentioned.
> Anyway, still waiting for test reports of the people that can reproduce
> the timeouts. By the time I'll submit the patch it should have a much
> better changelog.
Thanks, sounds good.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-10 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 3:55 lk 3.17-rc4 blk_mq large write problems Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-10 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-10 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-10 18:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-10 18:26 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-10 18:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-10 18:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-09-11 0:58 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-11 2:00 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-11 3:48 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-09-11 5:37 ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-09-17 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-22 23:14 ` Douglas Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54109B81.5040302@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox