public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Robert Elliot <elliot@hp.com>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Question: request tag usage
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:29:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542507C9.2060901@suse.de> (raw)

Hi Christoph,

as discussed it would make sense to use the request->tag in eg
scmd_printk() to identify the command.
Which I duly did, only to figure out that the tag is always '-1', ie
tagging is not in use.
(Which is okay from the SCSI side, seeing the TCQ is basically a
SCSI parallel thing).
Looking closer I found plenty of code for handling tags in the block
layer (and the blk-mq stuff, of course), but virtually none of the
non-SPI driver seems to be using them.
Which makes the original idea a bit pointless, seeing that we need
to identify the command _always_, and not just if the host happens
to support tagging.

Which leads me to some questions:
- Is the stuff in blk-mq supposed to work as a superset of SCSI TCQ?
- If so, should any HBAs with a queue depth > 1 (which does not
  support TCQ) set the tag of a command?
  (that's what I've initially thought would happen ...)
- If not (and the ->tag field is basically unused), can't we
  have the HBA to fill in a value here?

What I would like to see is to have the '->tag' field as an
identification for the commands in flight. IE every HBA with a queue
depth > 1 should be setting the tags.

Which apparently was too much to hope for ...

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2014-09-26  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-26  6:29 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-09-26  8:03 ` Question: request tag usage Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26  8:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-09-26 10:12     ` James Bottomley
2014-09-26 12:41       ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-09-26 13:52     ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542507C9.2060901@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=elliot@hp.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox