From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Remove scmd->tag
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:36:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542D38CC.7000706@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141002112230.GB31346@lst.de>
On 10/02/2014 01:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
>> index a0c8c5d..cb68089 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
>> @@ -1527,7 +1527,6 @@ part2:
>> tmp[0] = IDENTIFY(((instance->irq == SCSI_IRQ_NONE) ? 0 : 1), cmd->device->lun);
>>
>> len = 1;
>> - cmd->tag = 0;
>
> The driver was explicitly setting the tag to zero here, so this needs
> a good explanation instead of a blind removal.
>
> But given how nice the code that Finn delivered in the past is I have high
> hopes that his NCR5380 overhaul will get rid of a lot of this cruft :)
>
Yep. (Removing the above line shouldn't actually doing any harm, as
the tagged queueing support in NCR5380 is currently disabled anyway).
(Famous last words).
But this was just a test for the feasibility of scmd->tag removal.
Once Finn's patchset is posted we definitely should be revisiting
it.
And arguably the tcm_loop and vmw_pvscsi patches are real bugfixes,
so maybe they should be applied anyway.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 10:43 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Remove scmd->tag Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] NCR5380: Whitespace cleanup Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 11:07 ` Finn Thain
2014-10-02 11:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: Remove references to linked commands Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] vmw_pvscsi: fixup tagging Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] tcm_loop: Fixup tag handling Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 10:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Remove scmd->tag Hannes Reinecke
2014-10-02 11:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-02 11:36 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2014-10-02 11:48 ` Finn Thain
2014-10-02 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542D38CC.7000706@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=webbnh@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox