From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] IB/srp: Eliminate free_reqs list Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <5444F669.1020803@acm.org> References: <5433E43D.3010107@acm.org> <5433E56E.6010600@acm.org> <20141017105939.GB7819@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141017105939.GB7819-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Sebastian Parschauer , Robert Elliott , Ming Lei , "linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/14 12:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> The free_reqs list is no longer needed now that we are using >> tags assigned by the block layer. Hence remove it. > > Is there any good reason not to fold this into the previous patch? The only reason why patches 10/12 and 11/12 are separate patches is to reduce the size of individual patches and hence to make it easier to review these patches. If everyone agrees I'm fine with folding patch 11/12 into patch 10/12. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html