public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipr: Disable async aborts
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:58:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544FA0EC.9030907@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414421403.6401.5.camel@jarvis.lan>

On 10/27/2014 09:50 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 09:37 -0500, Brian King wrote:
>> The ipr driver does not yet support async aborts, so disable this
>> for now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> By "does not yet support" do you mean doesn't work with or merely not
> tested with but seems to work OK?  if the former, then surely this
> should be a fixes patch with a cc to stable for all the kernels async
> abort is in (which is 3.14)

We were seeing some issues in our lab in abort paths with double completions.
This was the first change I made to help resolve this. Patch 2 is definitely
required and the first patch is more for sanity until we can do more abort
path regression testing. What I'd like to do is queue both of these patches
for fixes / stable, then run additional regression testing with async aborts
and re-enable it in a future kernel once I'm more comfortable with it.

If it simplifies things, I can resend the series and cc stable.

Thanks,

Brian


> 
> James
> 
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/scsi/ipr.c |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff -puN drivers/scsi/ipr.c~ipr_no_async_eh drivers/scsi/ipr.c
>> --- linux/drivers/scsi/ipr.c~ipr_no_async_eh	2014-10-24 08:57:53.169169509 -0500
>> +++ linux-bjking1/drivers/scsi/ipr.c	2014-10-24 08:57:53.175169579 -0500
>> @@ -6357,6 +6357,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template driver_
>>  	.sdev_attrs = ipr_dev_attrs,
>>  	.proc_name = IPR_NAME,
>>  	.no_write_same = 1,
>> +	.no_async_abort = 1,
>>  };
>>  
>>  /**
>> _
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center



      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-27 14:37 [PATCH 1/2] ipr: Disable async aborts Brian King
2014-10-27 14:50 ` James Bottomley
2014-10-28  8:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-29 21:16     ` Brian King
2014-10-30  8:17       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-28 13:58   ` Brian King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544FA0EC.9030907@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox