From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/36] mac_scsi: Cleanup PDMA code Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: <5453499A.4030001@suse.de> References: <20141027052607.105914311@telegraphics.com.au> <20141027052611.955142205@telegraphics.com.au> <5451ECC1.9030103@suse.de> <5451FA96.4050901@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58182 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752437AbaJaIeg (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:34:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Finn Thain Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , Michael Schmitz , Sam Creasey , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On 10/31/2014 08:18 AM, Finn Thain wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >=20 >> On 10/30/2014 08:46 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>> Any reason why you didn't re-indent [...] >> Ahh, forget it. >> >> Addressed with the next patch. >> >=20 > So, does it get your reviewed-by tag? (Thanks for reviewing all this,= =20 > BTW.) >=20 Yes. You can add the reviewed-by tag to this. > You also questioned mac_scsi.c whitespace in your review of, "[PATCH = v2=20 > 14/36] ncr5380: Remove pointless compiler command line override macro= s."=20 > By the end of this patch series, I thought that mac_scsi.c was in pre= tty=20 > good shape (?) >=20 I only later figured that you've fixed up mac_scsi.c eventually. So that's all in good shape. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html