From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] scsi: add new scsi-command flag for tagged commands Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:44:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5458AE07.7000004@suse.de> References: <1415087656-9491-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1415087656-9491-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <5458906D.4090708@suse.de> <20141104103535.GB19154@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42591 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752676AbaKDKo0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2014 05:44:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141104103535.GB19154@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , Robert Elliott , "Martin K. Petersen" , Bart van Assche , Jens Axboe , Kashyap Desai , Sreekanth Reddy , Mike Christie , Guennadi Liakhovetski , usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net On 11/04/2014 11:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:38:05AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Hmm. Flags with just one value in it ... >> bitfield, maybe? >=20 > Bitfields are nasty. And I see more use for flags, e.g. whatever is > left of eh_ehflags after the no_async_abort removal could be merged i= nto > it. >=20 Ack. Fair enough. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html