From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix performance burning or extracting audio etc. from multiple optical drives. Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:36:54 -0700 Message-ID: <5474B026.3040900@fb.com> References: <20141121100210.GC8866@infradead.org> <1416924562-16849-1-git-send-email-tim@seoss.co.uk> <20141125162620.GA31478@infradead.org> <5474AE9B.40104@fb.com> <20141125163241.GA25295@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.153.30]:33279 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbaKYQiF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:38:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141125163241.GA25295@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tim Small , tim@buttersideup.com, Wakko Warner , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Tim Waugh On 11/25/2014 09:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:19AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 11/25/2014 09:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> This looks reasonable to me. Jens, do you want to takes this >>> through the block tree? >>> >>> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig >> >> Yeah I can do that, though do we really need to do paride here? > > Well, no need to keep the mutex around in paride for no reason. But my > preference would be to just kill off paride anyway :) That's sort of my point. Performance optimization and paride, well... But it's not a huge deal, we can apply it. -- Jens Axboe