From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17] Clear up bidi command confusion Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:07:52 +0200 Message-ID: <54CA30A8.5020101@plexistor.com> References: <54C2390A.3000700@sandisk.com> <20150123131249.GA8045@infradead.org> <54C60FCC.4060601@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:55854 "EHLO mail-we0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753840AbbA2NHz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:07:55 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w62so23330481wes.7 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:07:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C60FCC.4060601@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On 01/26/2015 11:58 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Hello Christoph, > > This makes sense to me. I will rework this patch series as you proposed. > Do you have a bidi setup to test against? Sending xor command to scsi_dbg is only half the test for me because, yes there are two buffers, but they are of same size so bugs might be masked. (From experience) Thanks Boaz > Bart.