From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17] Clear up bidi command confusion Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:20:33 +0100 Message-ID: <54CA33A1.2020104@sandisk.com> References: <54C2390A.3000700@sandisk.com> <20150123131249.GA8045@infradead.org> <54C60FCC.4060601@sandisk.com> <54CA30A8.5020101@plexistor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1bon0072.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.72]:51168 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755863AbbA2NUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:20:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54CA30A8.5020101@plexistor.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh , Christoph Hellwig Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On 01/29/15 14:07, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 01/26/2015 11:58 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> Hello Christoph, >> >> This makes sense to me. I will rework this patch series as you proposed. > > Do you have a bidi setup to test against? > > Sending xor command to scsi_dbg is only half the test for me because, yes > there are two buffers, but they are of same size so bugs might be masked. > (From experience) Hello Boaz, If anyone would like to submit a scsi_debug patch that adds support to that kernel driver for a bidi command for which the input and output buffers have different sizes I think that would be helpful. Bart.