From: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
"Dr. Greg Wettstein" <greg@wind.enjellic.com>,
"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] Unifying the LIO and SCST target drivers
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:38:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F8A2B0.70202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F87F17.30207@sandisk.com>
On 03/05/2015 08:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If we would do what Nic proposed - modify SCST such that it uses
> configfs instead of sysfs - then that would result in the removal of at
> least one SCST feature that is important to its users, namely automatic
> population of the configuration filesystem with hardware target port
> information. Apparently Nic does not want to convert LIO from configfs
> to sysfs.
Clearly configfs is here to stay, but is there anything that says LIO
couldn't have both? Besides the issue at hand, there are some other bits
of useful info in LIO that aren't available because of configfs'
limitations, but that would be possible via sysfs.
-- Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 10:05 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Unifying the LIO and SCST target drivers Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 11:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-01-14 12:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-01-14 23:08 ` Quinn Tran
2015-01-15 0:52 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-01-15 9:08 ` [Lsf-pc] " Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-15 16:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-19 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-19 9:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-02-20 10:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-02-21 0:00 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-02-25 8:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-02-27 21:58 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-02-28 11:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-03-02 6:59 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-03-04 10:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-03-05 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-05 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-03-05 18:38 ` Andy Grover [this message]
2015-03-06 7:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-03-06 19:15 ` Andy Grover
2015-03-07 2:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-03-07 6:25 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-03-09 16:51 ` Andy Grover
2015-03-06 23:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-03-08 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-21 20:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-02-22 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-03-06 13:36 ` Bart Van Assche
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-03 10:06 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2015-02-09 13:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-02-12 13:04 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2015-03-06 0:01 Dr. Greg Wettstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F8A2B0.70202@redhat.com \
--to=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=greg@wind.enjellic.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).