From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Grover Subject: Re: [RFC 00/22] target: se_node_acl LUN list RCU conversion Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:35:55 -0700 Message-ID: <5519A59B.7060903@redhat.com> References: <1427443512-8925-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <20150330120823.GA20193@infradead.org> <5519A0F4.4020102@redhat.com> <20150330192130.GA27541@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150330192130.GA27541@infradead.org> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel , linux-scsi , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Nicholas Bellinger List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 03/30/2015 12:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: >> I dug my patches up and rebased on top of target-pending/for-next. Pushed >> here: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/grover/linux.git >> mar30-dynalloc-deve >> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/grover/linux.git/log/?h=mar30-dynalloc-deve >> >> if this is helpful for your efforts. > > See the branch above, it does everything your old series did except > for dynamic allocation of the LUNs, although it gets there through a > different way. > And you got rid of the redundant LUNFLAGS_READ_WRITE flag too, nice. So what's next? Were you going to do the LUNs too? In addition to +perf and less mem usage, going down this path also leads to >256 LUNs per tpg. Woot! -- Andy