* [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw()
@ 2015-04-05 14:59 Akinobu Mita
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2015-04-05 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
Cc: Akinobu Mita, Nicholas Bellinger, Sagi Grimberg,
Martin K. Petersen, Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley,
linux-scsi
Factor out code duplication in rd_execute_rw() into a helper function
rd_do_prot_rw(). This change is required to minimize the forthcoming
fix in rd_do_prot_rw().
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
---
* v2
- Pass dif_verify() function pointer to helper function instead of is_write,
suggested by Sagi Grimberg.
drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
index 98e83ac..ac5e8d2 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
@@ -382,6 +382,36 @@ static struct rd_dev_sg_table *rd_get_prot_table(struct rd_dev *rd_dev, u32 page
return NULL;
}
+typedef sense_reason_t (*dif_verify)(struct se_cmd *, sector_t, unsigned int,
+ unsigned int, struct scatterlist *, int);
+
+static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
+{
+ struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
+ struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
+ struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
+ struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
+ u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
+ u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
+ u64 tmp;
+ sense_reason_t rc;
+
+ tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
+ prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
+ prot_page = tmp;
+
+ prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
+ if (!prot_table)
+ return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
+
+ prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
+ prot_table->page_start_offset];
+
+ rc = dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0, prot_sg, prot_offset);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
static sense_reason_t
rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
enum dma_data_direction data_direction)
@@ -420,23 +450,7 @@ rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
cmd->t_task_lba, rd_size, rd_page, rd_offset);
if (cmd->prot_type && data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
- struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
- struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
- u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
- u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
-
- tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
- prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
- prot_page = tmp;
-
- prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
- if (!prot_table)
- return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
-
- prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page - prot_table->page_start_offset];
-
- rc = sbc_dif_verify_write(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0,
- prot_sg, prot_offset);
+ rc = rd_do_prot_rw(cmd, sbc_dif_verify_write);
if (rc)
return rc;
}
@@ -503,23 +517,7 @@ rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
sg_miter_stop(&m);
if (cmd->prot_type && data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
- struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
- struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
- u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
- u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
-
- tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
- prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
- prot_page = tmp;
-
- prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
- if (!prot_table)
- return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
-
- prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page - prot_table->page_start_offset];
-
- rc = sbc_dif_verify_read(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0,
- prot_sg, prot_offset);
+ rc = rd_do_prot_rw(cmd, sbc_dif_verify_read);
if (rc)
return rc;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*
2015-04-05 14:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Akinobu Mita
@ 2015-04-05 14:59 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-06 8:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-08 5:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-04-06 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-08 5:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2015-04-05 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: target-devel
Cc: Akinobu Mita, Nicholas Bellinger, Sagi Grimberg,
Martin K. Petersen, Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley,
linux-scsi
The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
can be iterated by sg_next().
However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
---
* No change from v1
drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
@@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
+ bool need_to_release = false;
struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
- u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
+ u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
u64 tmp;
- sense_reason_t rc;
+ sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
@@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
if (!prot_table)
return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
- prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
- prot_table->page_start_offset];
+ prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
+ PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
+ if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
+ int i;
+
+ prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!prot_sg)
+ return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
+
+ need_to_release = true;
+ sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
+ if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
+ prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
+ prot_page + i);
+ if (!prot_table)
+ goto out;
+ sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
+ }
+ prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
+ prot_table->page_start_offset];
+ }
+ } else {
+ prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
+ prot_table->page_start_offset];
+ }
rc = dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0, prot_sg, prot_offset);
+out:
+ if (need_to_release)
+ kfree(prot_sg);
return rc;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
@ 2015-04-06 8:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-08 5:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2015-04-06 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akinobu Mita, target-devel
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger, Martin K. Petersen, Christoph Hellwig,
James E.J. Bottomley, linux-scsi
On 4/5/2015 5:59 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
> can be iterated by sg_next().
>
> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
>
> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> * No change from v1
>
> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
> struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
> struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> + bool need_to_release = false;
> struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
> u64 tmp;
> - sense_reason_t rc;
> + sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>
> tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> if (!prot_table)
> return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>
> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> - prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
> + PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
> + if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
> + int i;
> +
> + prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!prot_sg)
> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> +
> + need_to_release = true;
> + sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
> + if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
> + prot_page + i);
> + if (!prot_table)
> + goto out;
> + sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
> + }
> + prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + }
> + } else {
> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + }
>
> rc = dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0, prot_sg, prot_offset);
> +out:
> + if (need_to_release)
> + kfree(prot_sg);
>
> return rc;
> }
>
Acked-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
2015-04-06 8:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
@ 2015-04-08 5:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-04-08 14:25 ` Akinobu Mita
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger @ 2015-04-08 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akinobu Mita
Cc: target-devel, Sagi Grimberg, Martin K. Petersen,
Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley, linux-scsi
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
> can be iterated by sg_next().
>
> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
>
> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> * No change from v1
>
> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
> struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
> struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> + bool need_to_release = false;
> struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
> u64 tmp;
> - sense_reason_t rc;
> + sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>
> tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> if (!prot_table)
> return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>
> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> - prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
> + PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
> + if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
> + int i;
> +
> + prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!prot_sg)
> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> +
> + need_to_release = true;
> + sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
> + if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
> + prot_page + i);
> + if (!prot_table)
> + goto out;
> + sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
> + }
> + prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + }
> + } else {
> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> + }
>
Mmm, how about just explicitly doing sg_link() at prot_table scatterlist
creation time instead..?
That would save the extra allocation above, and AFAICT make for simpler
code.
--nab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*
2015-04-08 5:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
@ 2015-04-08 14:25 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-09 6:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2015-04-08 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Cc: target-devel, Sagi Grimberg, Martin K. Petersen,
Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
2015-04-08 14:13 GMT+09:00 Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>:
> On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
>> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
>> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
>> can be iterated by sg_next().
>>
>> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
>> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
>> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
>> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
>>
>> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
>> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
>> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
>> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> * No change from v1
>>
>> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
>> struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
>> struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
>> struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
>> + bool need_to_release = false;
>> struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
>> u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
>> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
>> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
>> u64 tmp;
>> - sense_reason_t rc;
>> + sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>>
>> tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
>> prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
>> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
>> if (!prot_table)
>> return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>>
>> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
>> - prot_table->page_start_offset];
>> + prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
>> + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
>> + if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!prot_sg)
>> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>> +
>> + need_to_release = true;
>> + sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
>> + if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
>> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
>> + prot_page + i);
>> + if (!prot_table)
>> + goto out;
>> + sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
>> + }
>> + prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
>> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
>> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
>> + }
>>
>
> Mmm, how about just explicitly doing sg_link() at prot_table scatterlist
> creation time instead..?
Yeap, that would be an optimal solution. But some architectures don't
support sg chaining (i.e. !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN).
> That would save the extra allocation above, and AFAICT make for simpler
> code.
Do you prefer fixing it conditionally with using #ifdef ? (i.e.
sg chaining at creating time if CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN is defined,
otherwise do the extra allocation above) If so, I'll resubmit the
patch with such changes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*
2015-04-08 14:25 ` Akinobu Mita
@ 2015-04-09 6:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger @ 2015-04-09 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akinobu Mita
Cc: target-devel, Sagi Grimberg, Martin K. Petersen,
Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:25 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-04-08 14:13 GMT+09:00 Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>:
> > On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
> >> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
> >> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
> >> can be iterated by sg_next().
> >>
> >> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
> >> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
> >> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
> >> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
> >>
> >> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> >> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> >> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> >> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >> * No change from v1
> >>
> >> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> >> struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
> >> struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
> >> struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> >> + bool need_to_release = false;
> >> struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> >> u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> >> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> >> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
> >> u64 tmp;
> >> - sense_reason_t rc;
> >> + sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >>
> >> tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> >> prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> >> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> >> if (!prot_table)
> >> return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >>
> >> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> >> - prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> + prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
> >> + PAGE_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> + /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
> >> + if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!prot_sg)
> >> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >> +
> >> + need_to_release = true;
> >> + sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
> >> + if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
> >> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
> >> + prot_page + i);
> >> + if (!prot_table)
> >> + goto out;
> >> + sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
> >> + }
> >> + prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
> >> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> + }
> >> + } else {
> >> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> >> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> + }
> >>
> >
> > Mmm, how about just explicitly doing sg_link() at prot_table scatterlist
> > creation time instead..?
>
> Yeap, that would be an optimal solution. But some architectures don't
> support sg chaining (i.e. !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN).
>
> > That would save the extra allocation above, and AFAICT make for simpler
> > code.
>
> Do you prefer fixing it conditionally with using #ifdef ? (i.e.
> sg chaining at creating time if CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN is defined,
> otherwise do the extra allocation above) If so, I'll resubmit the
> patch with such changes.
Yes please.
It would be nice to use sg_link() for the typical case when available,
as long as the #idefs aren't too ugly and limited to target_core_rd.c
code.
--nab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw()
2015-04-05 14:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Akinobu Mita
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
@ 2015-04-06 7:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-06 11:16 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-08 5:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2015-04-06 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akinobu Mita, target-devel
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger, Martin K. Petersen, Christoph Hellwig,
James E.J. Bottomley, linux-scsi
On 4/5/2015 5:59 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Factor out code duplication in rd_execute_rw() into a helper function
> rd_do_prot_rw(). This change is required to minimize the forthcoming
> fix in rd_do_prot_rw().
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> * v2
> - Pass dif_verify() function pointer to helper function instead of is_write,
> suggested by Sagi Grimberg.
>
> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> index 98e83ac..ac5e8d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> @@ -382,6 +382,36 @@ static struct rd_dev_sg_table *rd_get_prot_table(struct rd_dev *rd_dev, u32 page
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +typedef sense_reason_t (*dif_verify)(struct se_cmd *, sector_t, unsigned int,
> + unsigned int, struct scatterlist *, int);
> +
> +static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> +{
> + struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
> + struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
> + struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> + struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> + u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> + u64 tmp;
> + sense_reason_t rc;
> +
> + tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> + prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> + prot_page = tmp;
> +
> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
> + if (!prot_table)
> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> +
> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
> +
> + rc = dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0, prot_sg, prot_offset);
> +
> + return rc;
Nit, Given there is no action on the returned rc, this can be reduced to:
return dif_verify();
> +}
> +
> static sense_reason_t
> rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> enum dma_data_direction data_direction)
> @@ -420,23 +450,7 @@ rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> cmd->t_task_lba, rd_size, rd_page, rd_offset);
>
> if (cmd->prot_type && data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> - struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> - struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> - u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> -
> - tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> - prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> - prot_page = tmp;
> -
> - prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
> - if (!prot_table)
> - return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> -
> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page - prot_table->page_start_offset];
> -
> - rc = sbc_dif_verify_write(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0,
> - prot_sg, prot_offset);
> + rc = rd_do_prot_rw(cmd, sbc_dif_verify_write);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -503,23 +517,7 @@ rd_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
> sg_miter_stop(&m);
>
> if (cmd->prot_type && data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> - struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> - struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> - u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> - u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> -
> - tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> - prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> - prot_page = tmp;
> -
> - prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
> - if (!prot_table)
> - return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> -
> - prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page - prot_table->page_start_offset];
> -
> - rc = sbc_dif_verify_read(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0,
> - prot_sg, prot_offset);
> + rc = rd_do_prot_rw(cmd, sbc_dif_verify_read);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw()
2015-04-06 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Sagi Grimberg
@ 2015-04-06 11:16 ` Akinobu Mita
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2015-04-06 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg
Cc: target-devel, Nicholas Bellinger, Martin K. Petersen,
Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
2015-04-06 16:43 GMT+09:00 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>:
> On 4/5/2015 5:59 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>
>> Factor out code duplication in rd_execute_rw() into a helper function
>> rd_do_prot_rw(). This change is required to minimize the forthcoming
>> fix in rd_do_prot_rw().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
>> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
>> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
>> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> * v2
>> - Pass dif_verify() function pointer to helper function instead of
>> is_write,
>> suggested by Sagi Grimberg.
>>
>> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 66
>> ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> index 98e83ac..ac5e8d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
>> @@ -382,6 +382,36 @@ static struct rd_dev_sg_table
>> *rd_get_prot_table(struct rd_dev *rd_dev, u32 page
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +typedef sense_reason_t (*dif_verify)(struct se_cmd *, sector_t, unsigned
>> int,
>> + unsigned int, struct scatterlist *,
>> int);
>> +
>> +static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify
>> dif_verify)
>> +{
>> + struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
>> + struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
>> + struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
>> + struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
>> + u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
>> + u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
>> + u64 tmp;
>> + sense_reason_t rc;
>> +
>> + tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
>> + prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + prot_page = tmp;
>> +
>> + prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev, prot_page);
>> + if (!prot_table)
>> + return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>> +
>> + prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
>> + prot_table->page_start_offset];
>> +
>> + rc = dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors, 0, prot_sg,
>> prot_offset);
>> +
>> + return rc;
>
>
> Nit, Given there is no action on the returned rc, this can be reduced to:
> return dif_verify();
You are right, but the patch 2/2 inserts the lines to release
temporary prot_sg before return statement, so assignment and return
statements will be both required in the end.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw()
2015-04-05 14:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Akinobu Mita
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
2015-04-06 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Sagi Grimberg
@ 2015-04-08 5:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas A. Bellinger @ 2015-04-08 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akinobu Mita
Cc: target-devel, Sagi Grimberg, Martin K. Petersen,
Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley, linux-scsi
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Factor out code duplication in rd_execute_rw() into a helper function
> rd_do_prot_rw(). This change is required to minimize the forthcoming
> fix in rd_do_prot_rw().
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> * v2
> - Pass dif_verify() function pointer to helper function instead of is_write,
> suggested by Sagi Grimberg.
>
> drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
Nice patch. Applied to for-next with a bit of fuzz due to the
WRITE_STRIP + READ_INSERT related changes already queued up..
Thanks Akinobu!
--nab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-09 6:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-05 14:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Akinobu Mita
2015-04-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_* Akinobu Mita
2015-04-06 8:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-08 5:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-04-08 14:25 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-09 6:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-04-06 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] target/rd: reduce code duplication in rd_execute_rw() Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-06 11:16 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-08 5:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox