From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mpt2sas: store scsi io tracker data in the scsi command / request
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 13:22:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55242E7E.1080705@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150407161823.GA19547@lst.de>
On 04/07/2015 10:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:13:23AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> The mq case will also work for the !mq case when you call
>>> scsi_host_find_tag and scsi_cmd_priv. In general all the mq-specific
>>> codepathes you add should become the default and only one, even if this
>>> requires a lit bit of additional core work.
>>
>> For the core code, I definitely agree. But for this case, in scsi-mq mode,
>> we know that tag == smid - 1. That's not the case if we are not using
>> scsi-mq.
>
> It is if you use the old block tagging code with host-wide tags.
> I guess you'll need to tell mpt2 and mpt3 to use that firs, though.
Yup
>> In general, it'd be great if we could "convert" drivers and not have to
>> support both scsi-mq and legacy mode. Then I could just rip the old code.
>
> Well, the whole point is that you should be able to write a driver like
> your mq version and it should just work. Even better would be if we
It'd be nice to have a host template flag that says "I only run
scsi-mq", so we didn't have to cater to both cases. Or maybe that
already exists and I just didn't look hard enough.
> could get rid of the old case entirely for scsi, but for that we need
> a I/O scheduler for blk-mq first :)
I hear ya :)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-03 15:58 [PATCH RFC] mpt2/mpt3sas lock reduction for scsi-mq Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: allow the callback to blk_mq_tag_busy_iter() to stop looping Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add helper to iterate all busy tags on all hardware queues Jens Axboe
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi: add scsi-mq helpers to retrieve pdu and check started state Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi: add scsi-mq helper for iterating over busy commands Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: add host template init/exit_command hooks Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] mpt2sas: store scsi io tracker data in the scsi command / request Jens Axboe
2015-04-05 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07 16:13 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-07 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07 19:22 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-04-03 15:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] mpt3sas: " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55242E7E.1080705@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).