From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [RFC] Simlify dif_verify routines and fixup fileio protection information code. Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:07:11 +0300 Message-ID: <552E384F.3030203@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1428945575-30839-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <552D4C7B.9000402@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:35825 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbbDOKHQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 06:07:16 -0400 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so147890842wid.0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 03:07:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Akinobu Mita Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig On 4/15/2015 2:52 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: >>> >>> Looks good... >>> >>> I'll test with these patches and check if the problems I met >>> disappear. >> >> >> Thanks Akinobu, >> >> Waiting to hear your verdict before sending a formal patchset. > > I hit a original bug in sbc_dif_verify() which is not introduced by > your patch set, though. What is this original bug? > Please consider to include attached patch. I'll include it. thanks. > I'm still seeing another problem and trying to find out a root cause, > but it seems like it's caused by other change in -next. > care to elaborate? Sagi.