public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] target: ensure se_cmd->t_prot_sg is allocated when required
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:26:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553CAF32.2030904@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429972410-7146-2-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>

On 4/25/2015 5:33 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Even if the device backend is initialized with protection info is
> enabled, some requests don't have the protection info attached for
> WRITE SAME command issued by block device helpers, WRITE command with
> WRPROTECT=0 by SG_IO ioctl, etc.
>
> So when TCM loopback fabric module is used, se_cmd->t_prot_sg is NULL
> for these requests and performing WRITE_INSERT of PI using software
> emulation by sbc_dif_generate() causes kernel crash.
>
> To fix this, introduce SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC for
> se_cmd_flags, which is used to determine that se_cmd->t_prot_sg needs
> to be allocated or use pre-allocated protection information by scsi
> mid-layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> * No change from v2
>
>   drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>   include/target/target_core_base.h      |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> index 7a9e7e2..fe52883 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> @@ -1450,6 +1450,7 @@ int target_submit_cmd_map_sgls(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, struct se_session *se_sess
>   	if (sgl_prot_count) {
>   		se_cmd->t_prot_sg = sgl_prot;
>   		se_cmd->t_prot_nents = sgl_prot_count;
> +		se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC;
>   	}
>
>   	/*
> @@ -2181,6 +2182,12 @@ static inline void transport_reset_sgl_orig(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>
>   static inline void transport_free_pages(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>   {
> +	if (!(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC)) {
> +		transport_free_sgl(cmd->t_prot_sg, cmd->t_prot_nents);
> +		cmd->t_prot_sg = NULL;
> +		cmd->t_prot_nents = 0;
> +	}
> +

Hi Akinobu,

Any reason why this changed it's location to the start of the function?

>   	if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_PASSTHROUGH_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC) {
>   		/*
>   		 * Release special case READ buffer payload required for
> @@ -2204,10 +2211,6 @@ static inline void transport_free_pages(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>   	transport_free_sgl(cmd->t_bidi_data_sg, cmd->t_bidi_data_nents);
>   	cmd->t_bidi_data_sg = NULL;
>   	cmd->t_bidi_data_nents = 0;
> -
> -	transport_free_sgl(cmd->t_prot_sg, cmd->t_prot_nents);
> -	cmd->t_prot_sg = NULL;
> -	cmd->t_prot_nents = 0;
>   }
>
>   /**
> @@ -2346,6 +2349,17 @@ transport_generic_new_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	bool zero_flag = !(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB);
>
> +	if (!(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC)) {
> +		if (cmd->prot_op != TARGET_PROT_NORMAL) {

This seems wrong,

What will happen for transports that will actually to allocate
protection SGLs? The allocation is unreachable since
SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC is not set...

I'd say this needs to be:

if (cmd->prot_op != TARGET_PROT_NORMAL &&
     !(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC)) {

> +			ret = target_alloc_sgl(&cmd->t_prot_sg,
> +					       &cmd->t_prot_nents,
> +					       cmd->prot_length, true);
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> +		}
> +
> +	}
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Determine is the TCM fabric module has already allocated physical
>   	 * memory, and is directly calling transport_generic_map_mem_to_cmd()
> @@ -2371,14 +2385,6 @@ transport_generic_new_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>   				return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>   		}
>
> -		if (cmd->prot_op != TARGET_PROT_NORMAL) {
> -			ret = target_alloc_sgl(&cmd->t_prot_sg,
> -					       &cmd->t_prot_nents,
> -					       cmd->prot_length, true);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> -		}
> -
>   		ret = target_alloc_sgl(&cmd->t_data_sg, &cmd->t_data_nents,
>   				       cmd->data_length, zero_flag);
>   		if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> index 480e9f8..13efcdd 100644
> --- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
> +++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ enum se_cmd_flags_table {
>   	SCF_PASSTHROUGH_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC = 0x00020000,
>   	SCF_COMPARE_AND_WRITE		= 0x00080000,
>   	SCF_COMPARE_AND_WRITE_POST	= 0x00100000,
> +	SCF_PASSTHROUGH_PROT_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC = 0x00200000,
>   };
>
>   /* struct se_dev_entry->lun_flags and struct se_lun->lun_access */
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-26  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1429972410-7146-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
2015-04-25 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] target: ensure se_cmd->t_prot_sg is allocated when required Akinobu Mita
2015-04-26  9:26   ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2015-04-26  9:44     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-27 12:57       ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-27 15:08         ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-25 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] target: handle odd SG mapping for data transfer memory Akinobu Mita
2015-04-26 10:07   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-27 13:03     ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-25 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] target: Fix sbc_dif_generate() and sbc_dif_verify() for WRITE SAME Akinobu Mita
2015-04-26  9:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-27 12:58     ` Akinobu Mita
2015-04-25 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] target/file: enable WRITE SAME when protection info is enabled Akinobu Mita
2015-04-26  9:58   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-04-27 13:02     ` Akinobu Mita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553CAF32.2030904@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --to=sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox