public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: struct request cleanups
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 13:41:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55491CF4.6060903@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429303042-12078-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

On 04/17/2015 02:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The first 5 patches move the magic IDE request types into the old IDE
> driver to keep the core block code clean of them.  Those are basically
> ready to merge, just like the 6th one which is a cleanup on it's own.
>
> The real RFC is the last one which allocates the block_pc specific
> data separately in the callers instead of bloating every struct
> request with it.  I always hated what we did, but with the upcoming
> split of nvme into transports and command sets we'll need a NVME
> equivalent of BLOCK_PC, and as NVMe was designed by crackmonkeys
> dreaming of an ATA controller the "command block" for NVME is even
> bigger than what we have to deal with in SCSI.
>
> Note that the old IDE driver doesn't compile with the last patch
> yet as there are major nightmares to sort out, and BLOCK_PC passthrough
> with dm-multipath doesn't work yet either.  If I get some general
> concensus on the approach I'll fix those of course.

These are nice improvements, it'd be great to get rid of embeeding the 
command block. I have applied 1-6 for 4.2.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17 20:37 RFC: struct request cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: rename REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL to REQ_TYPE_DRV_PRIV Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: move REQ_TYPE_ATA_TASKFILE and REQ_TYPE_ATA_PC to ide.h Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: move REQ_TYPE_SENSE to the ide driver Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 4/7] block: remove REQ_TYPE_PM_SHUTDOWN Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: move PM request support to IDE Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 6/7] nbd: stop using req->cmd Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 7/7] block: allocate block_pc data separate from struct request Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-06 11:46   ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-05-11  8:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-21 19:51 ` RFC: struct request cleanups Matthew Wilcox
2015-05-05 19:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55491CF4.6060903@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox