From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
To: Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
hch@infradead.org, jbottomley@parallels.com,
kashyap.desai@avagotech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] megaraid_sas : Modify return value of megasas_issue_blocked_cmd() and wait_and_poll() to consider command status returned by firmware
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 11:56:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5555C2C1.2010804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201505061333.t46DXdcM032441@palmhbs0.lsi.com>
On 05/06/2015 03:31 PM, Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com wrote:
> This patch is rebased on top of recently sent 18 patches(submitted by me) for megaraid_sas driver.
>
> Change the return value of wait_and_poll() and megsas_issue_blocked_cmd() based on MFI_STAT returned by firmware for that command. Earlier driver always
> send return type based on command completion (but never check MFI_STAT_OK for that command), so even if command is failed by firmware still driver will
> return SUCCESS status from these functions wait_and_poll() and megsas_issue_blocked_cmd() and if caller of these functions does not check command status
> (MFI_STAT), then it may endup using invalid data returned in DMA buffers(one of the example is megasas_ld_list_query DCMD). Best thing to avoid this type
> of issue is do error handling and set proper return type from caller function wait_and_poll() and megsas_issue_blocked_cmd().
>
> The change proposed in this patch will fix the regression introduced in patch- "90dc9d9 megaraid_sas : MFI MPT linked list corruption fix" inside function
> megasas_ld_list_query().
> Prior to this MFI MPT linked list corruption fix patch, megasas_ld_list_query() function used to check DCMD status(returned by firmware) but with
> this linked list corruption fix patch, DCMD status will not be checked inside function megasas_ld_list_query() and introduced this issue of wrong data
> being used by function megasas_ld_list_query().
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@avagotech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@avagotech.com>
This patch fixes an issue spotted on my test system.
Thanks for posting.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-06 13:31 [PATCH] megaraid_sas : Modify return value of megasas_issue_blocked_cmd() and wait_and_poll() to consider command status returned by firmware Sumit.Saxena
2015-05-15 9:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-05-15 9:44 ` Sumit Saxena
2015-05-15 9:56 ` Tomas Henzl [this message]
2015-05-29 10:22 ` Sumit Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5555C2C1.2010804@redhat.com \
--to=thenzl@redhat.com \
--cc=Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@avagotech.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).