From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian King Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] cxlflash: Base support for IBM CXL Flash Adapter Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:15:34 -0500 Message-ID: <5579D046.8070004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1433888152-7360-1-git-send-email-mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e19.ny.us.ibm.com ([129.33.205.209]:52706 "EHLO e19.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754821AbbFKSPz (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:15:55 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e19.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:15:50 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD3D38C8039 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t5BIFl0t59310286 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:15:47 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t5BIFhcA015479 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:15:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1433888152-7360-1-git-send-email-mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com Cc: "Matthew R. Ochs" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org, hch@infradead.org, mikey@neuling.org, imunsie@au1.ibm.com, "Manoj N. Kumar" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , mpe@ellerman.id.au On 06/09/2015 05:15 PM, Matthew R. Ochs wrote: > SCSI device driver to support filesystem access on the IBM CXL Flash adapter. > > Supported-by: Stephen Bates > Reviewed-by: Michael Neuling > Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs > Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar Reviewed-by: Brian King Hi James, This driver is dependent on a bunch of core cxl support going in the powerpc tree. Are you OK with this going through the powerpc tree so they can both go in a single pull request to Linus? Are there any additional discussion points or issues you think need to be resolved before that happens, or should Michael look at queuing this up for -next? Thanks, Brian -- Brian King Power Linux I/O IBM Linux Technology Center