From: Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
To: open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iSCSI: let session recovery_tmo sysfs writes persist across recovery
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:33:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55818520.7030800@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434496033-4601-1-git-send-email-cleech-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 06/16/2015 06:07 PM, Chris Leech wrote:
> The iSCSI session recovery_tmo setting is writeable in sysfs, but it's
> also set every time a connection is established when parameters are set
> from iscsid over netlink. That results in the timeout being reset to
> the default value after every recovery.
>
> The DM multipath tools want to use the sysfs interface to lower the
> default timeout when there are multiple paths to fail over. It has
> caused confusion that we have a writeable sysfs value that seem to keep
> resetting itself.
>
> This patch adds an in-kernel flag that gets set once a sysfs write
> occurs, and then ignores netlink parameter setting once it's been
> modified via the sysfs interface. My thinking here is that the sysfs
> interface is much simpler for external tools to influence the session
> timeout, but if we're going to allow it to be modified directly we
> should ensure that setting is maintained.
>
What happened? Why didn't you make it more generic so all future iscsi
sysfs settings work the same way like when I reviewed it in the bz? Did
it get too messy when we only have the one writeable attr?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 23:07 [PATCH] iSCSI: let session recovery_tmo sysfs writes persist across recovery Chris Leech
[not found] ` <1434496033-4601-1-git-send-email-cleech-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 14:33 ` Mike Christie [this message]
[not found] ` <55818520.7030800-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 15:31 ` Chris Leech
2015-06-17 15:40 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55818520.7030800@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc-hcno3ddehluvc3sceru5cw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox