From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: integrate scsi_dh better into the scsi core V2 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:06:46 +0200 Message-ID: <558413E6.7010503@suse.de> References: <1431283260-13406-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150518172851.GA8964@infradead.org> <555A2320.8090105@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48226 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbbFSNGt (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:06:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <555A2320.8090105@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer , Mike Christie , "Martin K. Petersen" On 05/18/2015 07:36 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 05/18/2015 07:28 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Any chance to get reviews for the updated patch 1 and the new patch = 3 >> so that the whole series is in reviewed state? >> > Working on it. >=20 > There had been issues with v1 where multipath wouldn't start up prope= rly > if no hardware handlers were attached which I need to check before > sending out the review. >=20 So, I've been looking into it. While the principle is okay, there are some issues with the current state (eg sdev->handler is never assigned). Do you have an updated patchset or should I send some incremental patches? Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: F. Imend=F6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n