From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: retry MODE SENSE on unit attention
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 08:19:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559A9C6B.7060908@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436181409-83358-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
On 07/06/2015 04:16 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The 'sd' driver is calling scsi_mode_sense() to figure out
> internal details. But scsi_mode_sense() never checks for
> any pending unit attentions, leading to incorrect decisions
> during probing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index b1a2631..4f3c120 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ scsi_mode_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev, int dbd, int modepage,
> unsigned char cmd[12];
> int use_10_for_ms;
> int header_length;
> - int result;
> + int result, retry_count = retries;
> struct scsi_sense_hdr my_sshdr;
>
> memset(data, 0, sizeof(*data));
> @@ -2502,6 +2502,11 @@ scsi_mode_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev, int dbd, int modepage,
> data->block_descriptor_length = buffer[3];
> }
> data->header_length = header_length;
> + } else if ((status_byte(result) == CHECK_CONDITION) &&
> + scsi_sense_valid(sshdr) &&
> + sshdr->sense_key == UNIT_ATTENTION && retry_count) {
> + retry_count--;
> + goto retry;
> }
>
> return result;
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 11:16 [PATCH] scsi: retry MODE SENSE on unit attention Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-06 15:19 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-12 14:12 Hannes Reinecke
2015-06-11 11:01 Hannes Reinecke
2015-06-11 15:07 ` Ewan Milne
2015-06-12 6:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-06-12 14:08 ` Ewan Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559A9C6B.7060908@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).