From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] sd: retry READ CAPACITY for ALUA state transition
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:20:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559CC12B.3000002@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559C3B1A.3020002@sandisk.com>
On 07/07/2015 10:48 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 11:18 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> However, to handle the above case correctly we would need to keep
>> track of the entire multipath topology, to figure out which devices
>> belong to that relative target port and might need to be updated
>> (there might be several paths in standby, and we will have sent the
>> RTPG only for one of them).
>> Patches for that are not done yet, so I thought the above patch
>> would be a simple stop-gap measure.
>
> Hello Hannes,
>
> Are you sure that keeping track of the entire multipath topology
> would be required to implement what I proposed ? In the patch
> "scsi_dh_alua: Use separate alua_port_group structure"
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/101388/focus=101380) I see
> that the new scsi_dh_alua code keeps track of the target port group
> (TPG) ID and relative target port (RTP) ID. As you know this
> information can be queried for each LUN via the Device
> Identification VPD page. How about caching the TPG and RTP IDs per
> LUN such that the scsi_dh_alua code can figure out which LUNs are
> associated with which target ports by iterating over the known LUNs ?
>
I did intentionally _not_ store a pointer to the attached LUN in the
alua_port_group structure, as this would induce yet another
potential race condition when devices are being removed.
But meanwhile I've come up with a simpler patch which handles this
rather elegantly (methinks :-), and doesn't require any additional
infrastructure.
I'll be posting it shortly.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 11:12 [PATCHv2] sd: retry READ CAPACITY for ALUA state transition Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-06 15:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-07-06 20:57 ` James Bottomley
2015-07-07 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-07-07 20:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-07-08 6:20 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559CC12B.3000002@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).