From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix host max depth checking for the 'queue_depth' sysfs interface Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:32:00 +0200 Message-ID: <55A51D60.9010600@suse.de> References: <20150713142439.GA14427@kernel.dk> <20150714071358.GA31117@infradead.org> <55A4F0FD.6070305@suse.de> <55A516E3.8040708@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40792 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751777AbbGNOcC (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:32:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" , Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 07/14/2015 04:20 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Jens" =3D=3D Jens Axboe writes: >=20 >>> Fully agreed. I would vote for making the host template read-only a= nd >>> modify all drivers to use the shost setting. >=20 > Jens> Indeed, that would be a much saner choice. The settings in a > Jens> (effectively already) read-only host template seems like somewh= at > Jens> of a relic. >=20 > Agree 100%. >=20 While we're at it: why is the 'cmd_pool' attached to the host template? Do all hosts with the same driver share a common pool? (I sincerely do hope not ...) Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: F. Imend=F6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html