From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] IBM request to allow unprivledged ioctls [Was: Revert "dm mpath: fix stalls when handling invalid ioctls"]
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:47:06 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5632316A.5060909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151029131810.GA26841@redhat.com>
Hi Mike,
On 10/29/2015 11:18 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Sorry but I fail to see why your request to revert is viable.
No problem. Thanks for moving this for a discussion on a proper fix.
I'm somewhat new to kernel and SCSI workings and its community process,
so that's certainly appreciated.
> Wouldn't the correct fix be to train scsi_verify_blk_ioctl() to work
> even without SYS_CAP_RAWIO?
I see it would fix the problem as well, but I don't happen to know
all of its usages, so I'd have to defer to question to someone who
knows more of it.
> I'm not doubting that the commit caused problems for the case you care
> about (unprivledged users issueing ioctls) but that is an entirely
> different issue that needs to be discussed more directly (with the
> broader linux-scsi community, now cc'd).
Sure. Thanks for opening the discussion.
> p.s. leaving full context for linux-scsi so they don't need to track
> down other mails (btw, thanks for the detailed patch header but it
> enabled me to be skeptical of your request to revert):
You're welcome. If it's been useful for rejecting this patch and
getting a better one later, it's worth it. :)
Kind regards,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1446121463-17828-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-29 13:18 ` IBM request to allow unprivledged ioctls [Was: Revert "dm mpath: fix stalls when handling invalid ioctls"] Mike Snitzer
2015-10-29 14:47 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira [this message]
2015-10-31 15:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-31 18:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-31 18:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-31 19:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-31 22:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 7:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 9:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 13:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 13:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 14:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 14:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 15:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 14:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 15:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-02 15:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-02 15:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-02 9:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5632316A.5060909@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).