From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Don Brace Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 22/25] hpsa: enhance device messages Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:54:27 -0600 Message-ID: <56379543.7000907@pmcs.com> References: <20151028215206.5323.84194.stgit@brunhilda> <20151028220644.5323.17616.stgit@brunhilda> <56337F81.1040403@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:36680 "EHLO mail-ob0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753569AbbKBQy3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:54:29 -0500 Received: by obctp1 with SMTP id tp1so8598233obc.3 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:54:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56337F81.1040403@redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Tomas Henzl , scott.teel@pmcs.com, Kevin.Barnett@pmcs.com, scott.benesh@pmcs.com, james.bottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org, Justin.Lindley@pmcs.com, elliott@hpe.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 10/30/2015 09:32 AM, Tomas Henzl wrote: > RAID_UNKNOWN is used in few other places - raid_level_show for example, raid_level_show handles physical devices by using "N/A", otherwise it displays the RAID level for logical devices. Other functions avoid the use of raid_type when the drive is not a RAID device. Or, am I missing your point?