From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Duncan Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] SCSI: hosts: update to use ida_simple for host_no management Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:48:12 -0800 Message-ID: <5669F31C.2010409@suse.com> References: <1444830904.2220.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <561EA018.7020700@suse.com> <1444848835.2220.50.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <5644BEE1.3010208@suse.com> <5649C79E.9070603@suse.de> <564A4EDC.8060805@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ewan Milne Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Hannes Reinecke , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Hannes Reinecke , Johannes Thumshirn , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 11/17/2015 03:20 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Lee" == Lee Duncan writes: > > Lee> Martin: I will be glad to update the patch, creating a modprobe > Lee> parameter as suggested, if you find this acceptable. > > For development use a module parameter would be fine. But I am concerned > about our support folks that rely on the incrementing host number when > analyzing customer log files. > > Ewan: How do you folks feel about this change? > Ewan? -- Lee Duncan