From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] SCSI: hosts: update to use ida_simple for host_no
 management
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:24:27 -0800
Message-ID: <56730BEB.2050007@suse.com>
References: <cover.1444241058.git.lduncan@suse.com>
 <f89fe3933ae899dc01f2eddd2a0cefac3383cf3c.1444241058.git.lduncan@suse.com>
 <1444830904.2220.28.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <561EA018.7020700@suse.com>
 <1444848835.2220.50.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <5644BEE1.3010208@suse.com>
 <yq1ziyhy38c.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> <5649C79E.9070603@suse.de>
 <564A4EDC.8060805@suse.com> <yq1d1v8tdr3.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
 <5669F31C.2010409@suse.com> <1449847911.4067.200.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <566DC3F0.6050206@suse.com> <1450105632.4091.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <566EE055.9050708@suse.de> <yq1r3iowk5j.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37761 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751112AbbLQTZm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:25:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <yq1r3iowk5j.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: emilne@redhat.com, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

On 12/14/2015 05:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> 
>>> I'm not opposed to having the module option if others (Martin?) feel
>>> they need it, but generally I think it's better to keep things as
>>> simple as possible.  So, unless there are strong objections, I would
>>> say no.
> 
> Hannes> Agreeing with Ewan here.
> 
> Hannes> I guess it's up to you to tell us whether you absolutely need a
> Hannes> module parameter ...
> 
> Still not a big ida fan but since the most people seem to be in favor of
> this I guess I'll have to bite the bullet.
> 
> I don't see much value in the module parameter since it will require
> customers to tweak their configs and reproduce. Not worth the hassle.
> 

Thank you Martin. I'll look at further cleaning up the host module, but
I think this still much better than leaving the code as is.

-- 
Lee Duncan